• Buttons@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In times past they got shit done, and now we see that what they’ve done is shit and we’re stuck maintaining it.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Half the time it’s trying to figure out where to apply the next piece of duct tape to keep the entire house of cards (and duct tape) from collapsing.

    • szczuroarturo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. Thats just enterprise software for you. Something was made requiremnts changed, and then changed again and then ypu have duct tape on top of a duct tape with a duct tape holding those duct tapes and a touch of super glu here and there. Also ducttapes are microscopic in size but the sheer quantity of them is unimaginable.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an aside, I recall the early days when @SwiftOnSecurity was purposely ambiguous about the distinction between the artist Taylor Swift and their technology tweets. It was delicious to see confused responses.

    At some point it changed. Not sure what triggered that. I have a vague memory of a stroke, but I might be misremembering.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This the dangerous kind of parody, I would rather help people with excel programs than another access program and that’s a pain in the ass.

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to joke with my niece that my programming job was just me staring at screens and meetings all day. She didn’t believe me until she got to shadow me one day and got super bored.

      • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not op but guessing she had an idea from media like TV shows and movies that make technical jobs seem much more exciting for entertainment over realism. Crises are usually more Jerry accidentally deleted a directory and we need to recover some files and establish safe guard procedures to prevent it from happening again or this thing broke that nobody even knew existed so we gotta figure it out and less type fast enough to save the mainframe from l33t hackers.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But when your brain is fascinated by all that has to happen for those screens and meetings to happen, it can still be an interesting job.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The scary thing is some people actually believe this, and NIH syndrome is unfortunately all too real lol

  • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with the last point tbh

    At the bare minimum, if you aren’t capable of contributing to the library you use, then you don’t deserve to use it.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree, if you aren’t capable of contributing to a library you should be required to use it rather than roll your own solution.

        • force@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because software devs have the weeks/months to learn vulkan every time they want to use a GUI for their job, or to learn compiler design whenever they wanna use java for their job

          • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            to learn vulkan every time they want to use a GUI for their job

            Not every time, just the first time. But yes. Devs should stop being so lazy

            compiler design whenever they wanna use java for their job

            Every dev should at least know the basics of language design and compiler design, yes. Again, you also only have to learn it once

            • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The best developers are the laziest.

              I’d take a dev slowly using a library with a one liner than a noob writing 500 lines of code doing the same thing any day.

              • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s how you end up with the unmaintainable state that enterprise software is currently in. “Just Works” mentality is a cancer

            • indepndnt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Honestly, why? We’ve got billions of people driving around in cars they don’t know how to build. Is that a problem too?

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              As someone who has written a DB handle… that shit is hard, I had to be extremely careful to protect against SQL injection. Everyone rolling their own is how we return to the Era of XSS and SQL Injection on every website. I’d prefer to have young devs use libraries and contribute as they gain knowledge.

                • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They do… but the road to naturally learning that lesson comes with the cost of enabling botnets and destroying businesses. Maybe there should be a qualification exam to be a developer but when there isn’t we need to make sure more junior developers have the best tools they can get to fight against foot guns.

                  Also, on the topic of security, a lot of good senior level developers don’t have the specialized knowledge to do shit like build a password validation system that isn’t vulnerable to a timing attack or know what a timing attack is…

                  And timezones, fuck timezones, I’ve written code that correctly handled timezones (and subsequently threw it away when Canada decided to DST on a different weekend). Imagine how shitty it’d be if we constantly had to reinvent the wheel when it came to timezones.

                  Oh, and forget about databases… do you know how fucking hard it is to write an ACID compliant WAL? The reason postgres is the default open source database (and why so many databases are just layers built on top of postgres’s engine) is because it’s fucking hard. Mongo still (IIRC) has consistency issues, they were a tech darling for half a decade and can’t manage to NoSQL as well as Postgres.

                  Also, good luck building a GUI with anything more complicated than curses style box art characters.

                  I started mildly disagreeing with you but I disagree even more that I’ve thought about other tools people would need to roll on their own.

    • MinekPo1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No its microsofts database GUI program that’s part of Microsoft Office . imagine software made for users who have a vague understanding of SQL and visual basic but then an exec. forced the designers and devs to make it accessible to everyone while giving them barely any teamembers causing a fuckton of technical debt and unintuitive quirks , making anyone who opens the software feel like they have just been placed in a highly equipped tank , in front of a wall of unlabeled levers and told to drive the tank , or at least that’s how I view it.

      (reposting from another account sorry if you see both comments)

    • urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      We use it at work for it’s actual intended purpose: as a small database that isn’t customer facing. It’s used and maintained by nontechnical staff to keep data about equipment (slot machines).

      It would be too much info for excel, but it’s not enough to really need anything more.

    • somethingp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No Microsoft Access is/was a GUI software actually meant to have databases instead of how everyone uses Excel/spreadsheets as databases. It is a part of the office suite. It works pretty much like traditional databases but has an easier to access GUI for non programmers I guess. I don’t think it’s used a ton nowadays except for legacy processes that haven’t been updated.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No its another program, I’ve seen people make weird stuff with it like ticketing systems and notes apps. I’ve never seen it be a robust program though

  • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve been spending decades curating our perception by management in order to make sure we all have jobs. He’s gonna ruin the whole industry if we don’t shut him the hell up