• quicken@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just chuck more data at it and hope for the best! It’s a pretty fun strategy even if it fails a lot

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      ML honestly sounds like a maddeningly dull profession to me because of this. It’s a cool technology but jiggling hyperparameters and then waiting would grate on me.

  • nottheengineer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Any task that can be expressed as mostly translation is a good task to try with an LLM.

    And you know what? Stakeholders tend to love LLMs, so have fun with your complicated problems while I build them by using the ancient technique of slapping some boilerplate together and combining it with the new ways of pasting error messages into chatgippity.

    • h3ndrik@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t think that was the point. The thing is, people replace calculators with that…

      • User: Assistant?
      • Assistant: * BEEP *
      • User: What is 21 divided by three?
      • Assistant: 52, my master.

      Thing is, they only get some results right and hallucinate others. And you’re doing billions of matrix multiplications just to calculate 2+1.

      Sure. You can go to a construction site with only your one favorite tool. And use it for everything. And it’s impressive to open a glass bottle of beer with a hammer and such. But I can guarantee you, you’ll be slower digging that hole than the guys using a proper tool like an excavator.