• mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Fair enough. What threw me is that you said “bytecode”, which is generally not used when referring to hardware machine instructions. My original comment is about patching the in-memory image of a running program or library, replacing machine instructions in order to intercept certain calls and extend their behavior.

    I thought my phrase “compiled code” would convey this, but I guess nowadays bytecode-compiled languages are so common that some people assume that instead.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah and part of this is that the domain I’ve been working in for years now is very far from machine code, and I’m probably overly lax with my language here.

      The result of being in very corporate app dev - I’m usually talking in much higher level abstractions. My bad on conflating bytecode and machine code