• Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    4 days ago

    I thought this couldn’t possibly as stupid as it sounds, so I read the article carefully and yes, it is as stupid as it sounds.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    We are committed to protecting Richmond’s waterways

    Wouldn’t want all that street runoff - full of dirt, oil, animal droppings, and who knows what else - to be contaminated by a little caffeine.

  • Gravitywell.xYz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Richmond-Upon-Thames Council has now said said it had cancelled the fine as it was “likely” that Ms Yesilyurt’s appeal would have been successful.

    Sounds like everyone involved knows this is a stupid law.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      The law is not stupid. This interpretation of it is stupid. It says not to pollute down drains. This was some coffee.

  • AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    wait… so what are the road gulleys for if not for liquid? are they for disposing of arby’s foiled wrappers?

      • wjrii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Can’t contaminate the motor oil, soot, rubber, broken glass, microplastics, litter, and accidentally-spilled coffee with purposely-spilled coffee! I hope the enforcement officers didn’t damage their pearls, or let them slip into the drain, from all that clutching.

        More seriously, this smacks of citation quotas to me.