• Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      For some the optionality of it is less important than the notion that if it’s performative, you can be bad at it and therefore make yourself an acceptable target for abuse, and besides that the idea that some roles can be restricted to only those with a certain set of physical characteristics is deeply ingrained in many, be that in terms gender, career, or what have you.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I understand that gender is made up and doesn’t matter. There is nothing girly or manly.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      In fact words all those words are a bunch of gibberish and neither the world nor reality works like that. I can just question the vague and often circular premises of that argument and we’re back to square zero.

      Not against the sentiment, but you’re never going to get anywhere with that pseudoacademic bullshit.

      • The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sooo what if a dude just decides to act like, dress like, and call themselves like a girl? Why would they not be allowed to do that? What about the laws of the universe takes away their agency to do that?

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Is this the most terminally online possible way of saying “gender is a social construct and I’m a gender abolitionist”?

      • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m entirely for gender abolitionism, but you really need to find some better rhetoric. “Cope and seethe, your arguments are shit” won’t work on most people

  • TxzK@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s often time better to not just argue with these asshats. Waste of your time and energy while achieving less than a dog barking at a tree.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Even tho im a cishet male i can absolutely imagine how freaking annoying these people could be.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s fucking stupid, they’re doing the same as their detractors. It’s just bullshit slinging on both sides. Of course only one side are bigoted cunts, which makes it easy to see who’s on the right side, but going just by the rhetoric on “our” side is fucking sophomoric at best.

        • AwkwardTurtle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sorry, I thought you meant the letter U, as in the U People. I’ve been looking for them for a long time. They live underground, you see, that’s where the U comes from. They’re hard to find! But if you find one, it is tasty!

              • shneancy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                in case you’re not joking and actually don’t know: AwkwardTurtle was one of the most universally disliked reddit mods, she modded a vast number of popular servers, and often banned people on a whim. There were multiple dramas surrounding her

                • AwkwardTurtle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Not joking, actually unaware of this mod until I took up the username here randomly haha.

                  I’ve never been a mod for anything :p

          • SPRUNT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thank you! Finally getting the respect U-people deserve instead of the derogatory term many use that labels us all as not-quite-human cannibals.

    • tan00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can’t gatekeep being nonbinary. Not unless you’re prepared to define it explicitly, which will exclude many people - and not everyone will agree with your definition either.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I said just because. Not that effeminate men aren’t capable of being nonbinary, merely that it is not sufficient (or necessary for that matter). You have to like actually not identify as entirely a man.

        But it’s not my place to fight I’m very much in the binary side of transness.

        • tan00k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Whose authority says it’s not sufficient? If they say they are nonbinary, they are nonbinary.

          • Sadbutdru@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            This is a miscommunication, you two are not really in disagreement as far as I can see. If someone {presents as an effeminate man} AND {they say they’re non-binary} => {they are non-binary}. However if someone {presents as an effeminate man} AND does NOT {say they’re non-binary}… Then it’s not sufficient.

          • ferret@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            OP means “don’t assume someone is non-binary because they are an effeminate man” and not “you aren’t non-binary just because you are an effeminate man”

              • ferret@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Their intent with the message was clearly less-than-literal. They tried to clear things up in replies but failed. I think it is quite clear that they meant no one any harm, and simply failed to convey their idea properly.

                • The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The comment itself should be edited to reflect the original intent, then. People can’t just say stupid and hyperbolic things and not be held socially accountable.

            • tan00k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I suppose that’s possible, but the thing you say OP is not saying is literally a quote. So at best it’s worded poorly.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nothing is anything, did people forget that these are all completely nonsense words with no connection to reality? No matter how scientific and very legal very cool semantic concepts you come up with it won’t change reality one fucking bit. Non binary… Nobody gives a FUCK, it has no correlation with ANYTHING in the Universe, it’s just another shit pseudophilosophical concept being shoved down everyone’s throat like it’s some kind of objective reality.

      It’s metaphysics, and “you people” (yes, YOU PEOPLE) suck at it.

      The shit you find in your belly hole while navel gazing is not worth shit.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are you transphobic as well? I’m genuinely curious. Or does transgender count as “real” in your view because it does have a far more strict definition?

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I am too tbh, I think the weird thing is enbies to me are inherently a sort of political commentary through identity on gender and our relationship to it, unless I’m just wrong.

            I think the whole issue is somewhat separate from trans people who mostly are just people with a mental neurodivergence/disorder called gender dysphoria that causes them anguish and is caused by their body’s sex and their brain’s innate sense of sex don’t agree and therefore they seek medical treatments like HRT and surgeries and documentation changes to help them perceive themselves and be perceived by others as members of the target sex as much as is humanly possible.

            Their political angle is to fight for access to said healthcare to be more common, available through insurance, be taken more seriously with faster wait times and be available to younger people since the effectiveness of a lot of the treatments like hormones depends on the age you start.

            Conflating the two imo is kinda like commentary on attention spans relating to social media and the actual neurological disorder ADHD.

            • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think it’s a little “exotic” to call my existence an inherent political commentary. It’s certainly something that can be used to inform political debate, but I believe saying that it’s inherent misses the point that our existence is only political because it’s politicized

              And for what it’s worth, gender dysphoria is also something experienced by nonbinary folks, but it isn’t a requirement of being trans or non-binary either. Some people just don’t experience it and requiring it as a clinical diagnosis is part of the medicalization of our and trans people’s existence as well.

              I don’t really know how to finish this lol, I agree with the rest of your comment. I just wanted to correct what I feel are common misconceptions.

      • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Idk dude I ngl I look like a long-haired Charlie Puth (to the point where different people have told me that I look like him on the same night lmao) but somehow people still get the wrong idea lol.

      • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        аҧсуа бызшәа
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The scientist in me is sooo tempted by the idea of setting up a website where people have to classify pictures of cis and well-passing trans people by AGAB to really drive the point home that no, those fuckers CANNOT tell. They can usually only tell when the person in question is in the progress of medical transition which is an instance of “no shit Sherlock, why do you think we want to get this done as quickly as possible”. And yes, Enbys are a bit of a different story, but even a lot of them pass very well as the opposite of their AGAB, even though they often don’t even identify as that.

        The big issue with this is that the vast majority of people making those kinds of statements are incapable of thinking rationally and instead just continue being bigots.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      As an amab man with long hair and emotions that is frequently misgenedered (even with facial hair) yall are down voting something that is far too true

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh my fucking god is that another fucking acronym that the pseudohomos came up with? No wonder people get tired of hearing it…

        Jesus christ the whole planet has just gone into retard overdrive.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You seem very angry. Is everything alright in your life? I’m sorry that you’re so upset by other people being happy :(

          Enjoy punching holes in your mom’s drywall.

    • Human Penguin@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Historically less so. Even back in the 80s lots of girls i knew and thought of as tom boys. Where forced to dress and act girlie by there parents. Further back you go more limits there were.

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Roosevelt_Longworth

        “I can either run the country or I can attend to Alice, but I cannot possibly do both”

        Chastised by some, loved by others, it depends a lot on the audience. I think overall though women have been given more a pass, pegged as ‘willfull’ or ‘impetuous’ where as with men it’s treated as a flaw that they should be shunned for.

        Think of the differing ways that daddy’s girl and mamma’s boy are perceived to get to what I mean.

  • Bigoldmustard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I will do whatever it takes to make my daughter happy and if that’s wrong I don’t want to be right.

    If that means being an army dude, paint my face. If that means being a princess at a tea party, paint my nails.

    Whatever she decides she wants to be, I want to be there cheering her on. If you take that attitude and try to extend it to everyone you meet you make a better world.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    First half is a conservative argument (gender roles)

    Second half is a liberal argument (abolish gender roles)

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I once asked myself what good gender roles ever do. I have yet to find a good answer. Almost everything about it comes down to making sure certain people are classed ahead of other people.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s actually a Russian sponsored non issue to pit us against one another. Sadly the conservatives bought into it hardstyle because they smell money and power to be made from the controversy.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    it’s designed so that you can’t win except by being and doing precisely what you’re told. this is because it’s designed by evil people and promoted by weak people.