• emb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not really federated so far, right? They talk a lot about being open, but (when) will they be really? Can I sign up for an account that intereacts with Bluesky through any other provider?

    I mean, I signed up, it seems interesting enough. If nothing else it has some recognizable accounts to follow, better network effect than Mastodon.

    • mysoulishome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sounds like they are saying (later this month) you can create your own Bluesky instance…but will they ever federate outside that?

    • canpolat@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t follow it very closely, but as far as I know, they are the only one implementing the open protocol they designed (which doesn’t interoperate with ActivityPub). However, there seems to be some efforts for creating a bridge: https://www.docs.bsky.app/blog/feature-bridgyfed

      As you said, there are some recognizable faces and that may impact the adoption. But not being compatible with ActivityPub is a real bummer.

    • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is some federation, however most instances that I’ve seen are people’s personal instances because in the past you’ve still needed a bluesky invite to federate with the main instance. Now that you don’t need an invite anymore I’m sure that’ll change and you’ll see more public 3rd party instances popping up.