• andreluis034@lm.put.tf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although it’s true that you are increasing the attack surface when compared to locally stored OTP keys, in the context of OTPs, it doesn’t matter. It still is doing it’s job as the second factor of authentication. The password is something you know, and the OTP is something you have (your phone/SIM card).

    I would argue it is much worse what 1Password and Bitwarden (and maybe others?) allows the users to do. Which is to have the both the password and the OTP generator inside the same vault. For all intents and purposes this becomes a single factor as both are now something you know (the password to your vault).

    • philomory@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not quite right though, there’s the factor you know (password to your vault), and the factor you have (a copy of the encrypted vault).

      Admittedly, I don’t use that feature either, but, it’s not as bad as it seems at first glance.

      • andreluis034@lm.put.tf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not quite right though, there’s the factor you know (password to your vault), and the factor you have (a copy of the encrypted vault).

        That would be true for offline vaults, but for services hosted on internet I don’t think so. Assuming the victim does not use 2FA on their Bitwarden account, all an attacker needs is the victim’s credentials (email and password). Once you present the factor you know, the vault is automatically downloaded from their services.


        This is something I hadn’t thought until know, but I guess password managers might(?) change the factor type from something you know (the password in your head) to something you have (the vault). At which point, if you have 2FA enabled on other services, you are authenticating with 2 things you have, the vault and your phone.

        • jpj007@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Assuming the victim does not use 2FA on their Bitwarden account

          A pretty tall assumption given that we’re already talking about someone who knows to turn on 2FA for other things. If someone knows about 2FA and password managers, they’d be insane not to have 2FA set up on the password manager itself.

          • andreluis034@lm.put.tf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s a fair point. I just wanted to highlight that there may be cases where a password manager isn’t automatically protected by 2FA by the two factors you mentioned (The password you know and the copy of the vault) since in the case of bitwarden fulfilling one can give you the second. In order to actually achieve 2FA in this case, you would need to enable OTPs.