no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agoWere you aware?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up1428arrow-down118
arrow-up1410arrow-down1imageWere you aware?lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-22 months agomessage-square15linkfedilink
minus-squareyesman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up39arrow-down3·2 months agoI called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
minus-squarescholar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up46·2 months agoNapoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·2 months agoAnecdotal evidence is so strong! There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·2 months ago… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
minus-squaresolsangraal@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoi get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
minus-squareBlueFootedPetey@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoSounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
I called a cop “Napoleon” once. He assumed I referred to the 18th century emperor. Not big readers, cops.
Napoleon the emperor who tried to conquer Europe and nearly succeeded is more famous than the fictional character so that makes sense
Anecdotal evidence is so strong!
There’s definitely no way you could be making a generalised statement from a single incident… /s
… because generalizations are always wrong, each and every time
i get it: you’re making a generalizing statement about generalizations being wrong, which makes the statement wrong
At least one person gets the joke
Sounds like a generalization, which I guess is wrong.
thatsthejoke.zip