• PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love the response you’re getting. A wholesome community until you have a different opinion. This is how you know Lemmy is simply comprised of the top crust layer of Reddit. The worst it had to offer.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A wholesome community until you have a different opinion.

      “Please tolerate my intolerance! You have to support me wanting people removed from the public! I’m normal!! You need to treat me equal while I don’t treat people equal, or you’re being hypocritical!!!”

      • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        “if you oppose my views, you’re a bigot, and I don’t debate bigots, hence I won’t debate you. I win”

        See, I can put words in quotation marks too. Look how cool we look.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance

          The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance. This paradox was articulated by philosopher Karl Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945),[1] where he argued that a truly tolerant society must retain the right to deny tolerance to those who promote intolerance. Popper posited that if intolerant ideologies are allowed unchecked expression, they could exploit open society values to erode or destroy tolerance itself through authoritarian or oppressive practices.

          This paradox raises complex issues about the limits of freedom, especially concerning free speech and the protection of liberal democratic values. It has implications for contemporary debates on managing hate speech, political extremism, and social policies aimed at fostering inclusivity without compromising the integrity of democratic tolerance.

          Above room temperature IQ shit, please use the brain I assume you’re equipped with, but my faith in that is dwindling.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Show solidarity by not considering “think of the children” transphobia as simply a “different opinion.” It’s not far from considering homosexuals “sick in the head.”

          • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            No one was talking about gay people. This is the problem when you try to lump a bunch of alphabet letters into the same group. They’re not a monolith.