Have to add that we work exclusively in strongly-typed languages. Kinda want to see how it plays out, but I can’t help but argue with him, so I think I’ll just go.

  • Pyro@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Python 3.x will never have static typing because that would break backwards compatibility.

    However, typing hints have been Integrated into Python for a while, and you are heavily recommended to use them, so your IDE can enforce typing.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Considering there is typing in the code why is there no switch to enable type checking at runtime? PHP does this with a per file declare(strict_types) - why would python be unable to have either a global or per file flag to enable checks?

      • Pyro@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Typing when you need it gives you more freedom over a toggle. You can choose to type some parts of the code while leaving other parts untyped.

        For example, if I’m writing a quick and simple Python script I may forgo typing, but when iterating on it I’d go back and add the types I need.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          This isn’t an issue, though. PHP has the same partial typing flexibility. There are ways to solve that issue and even typed PHP still allows union types including mixed which allows any types.