• exuA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s still CLI based, while Calamares is graphical, no?

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found archinstall to be very simple to follow, even though the whole thing is shown through the CLI, its basically just one page where you setup everything like partitions, boot, etc. Was a lot easier than I expected with the way everyone talks about it

      • Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        My only difficulty with it was that I have too many disks and partitions and I didn’t want to yeet the wrong one by mistake

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yea, it is a very simple CLI based TUI. And I prefer this over GUI in this case, to be honest.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Archinstall is TUI, it’s barely any more complicated than Calamares and gives pretty sane defaults and even the option to install DEs.

      • exuA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t get your point. Should we call EndevourOS Arch as well by your logic?