they were complaining about things that are only unpleasant because of their own feelings toward the situation

oh so you’re just an unhappy person

all opinions are ultimately inconsistent with reality in some way, indicating that they all do really originate from somewhere within ourselves

oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything

huh?

“they” uses the same number of characters as “s/he” and flows more naturally

it’s had offline navigation for years now

google maps can do that too though

try a factor of 100

unfortunately in reality it is a curved line on a sphere

I was referring to the fair in your hypothetical smartass

as if random civilians with guns wouldn’t bumble around more and also shoot the crowd?

metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event

that doesn’t necessarily mean it is possible though. just to be clear

how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument

not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism

I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist

arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered

edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn’t exist