she/her

  • 77 Posts
  • 141 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • That’s true! I meant more as an example of a community that because of its nature has to ban more than other communities!

    Also it occurs to me that I have no idea if rimu is looking at instance bans, community bans, or all bans. Instance bans will typically also include community bans which can inflate the numbers if all bans are counted in the data

    Edit: in fact it’s all weird. if you instance ban someone early before they can participate much they technically get very few community bans, whereas if you ban someone who has participated a lot they’ll get lots of community bans as well (when you are instance banned you get banned from all communities you’ve participated in on that instance). an instance that is more trigger happy will have fewer community bans than an instance that is slow to instance ban

    Edit 2: And then there’s temporary bans! I dunno if those have been counted



  • I don’t think this is terribly meaningful. Do you take into account unmoderated communities? Some communities and mods are also more ban happy than others, so one instance can have communities that very rarely ban and ones that ban a lot, and how big those communities are will also vary.

    A more meaningful analysis would try to measure the impact of ban-happy communities by adjusting for their size/activity or would compare individual communities.

    Edit: Some communities or mods also get harassed a lot and therefore need to be more ban happy (like womens stuff), but I don’t think accounting for that would be within the scope of what you’re looking at.







  • Jorunn (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    shield
    Mto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneConspiracy rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Gonna be real with you all.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the cannibalism stuff is true to some extent but I’m not equipped to sit here and fact check this. I’ve not seen all the emails but that one email shared was rather sus, but who knows with these rich fucks. Anyways, please don’t go full hog on something even if it’s likely. I think we can all live with this information squirreled into the “maybe true but we have enough reason to want to dethrone the oligarchs already so let’s hold off on saying that this is a fact until more info comes out” box.













  • They only go after people sharing files, and typically only people sharing lots of files. Technically when you torrent you are sharing files, but they don’t usually go after regular seeders. Sometimes your internet provider might ask you to stop being a pirate but that’s the most likely bad consequence for a regular pirate. Direct downloads, streaming, and usenet doesn’t involve actual sharing of files and so is perfectly legal, or at least not something that has consequences.

    There’s also stuff you can do to make it less likely that your illicit activities will be detected, but that’s not something I know a lot about. I imagine VPNs can help with this sorta stuff.

    Your wife is right that some people do go to prison for this, but that’s usually people like the ones behind pirate bay and similar.

    I’m not a half queer half law person, so take what I have to say with lots of salt and pepper.