• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • Oof. An always online terminal with an AI that does who knows what with the things you type? I don’t think so.

    Also, Open Sourcing the client but not the server seems like marketing at best.

    A quick Wikipedia also says that they basically run on investor money. Including Sam Altman and Jeff Weiner, the CEO of LinkedIn who had three massive data breaches in as many years.

    That’s a hard pass for me.

    It does look beautiful though


  • Yes, of course. But afaik the idea of flatpak is, that every program has a list of libraries and versions of them that it wants. So when program X was built with libfoo version 1 and program Y needs libfoo version 2, you basically download the library twice.

    When you go through the package manager, you just download the current version that’s in the repository. This can lead to problems when a program expects some functionality that has since been deprecated, but I never actually had issues with that.

    Also, a lot of the libraries a flatpak downloads are already installed on the system, just in a different version, I noticed.

    I’m on a home computer that I use by myself, mind you. So if something breaks, it’s just my own problem. If I were to use software in production or even just administer the computer of a tech-unsavy relative, I’d likely use flatpaks or similar for stability and security reasons.


  • twoshoes@lemmy.worldtoLinux@lemmy.mlIs there a downside to Flatpak?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve used flatpak for a while because it’s the default ob Fedoras GUI Software Center, but I’ve recently switched back to dnf and native packages where I can.

    The thing is, that I have a shitty 500GB SSD with a shitty 50Mbit Internet connection (which is closer to 30Mbit because my house still has lead cables instead of copper). So downloading 300+ MB of libraries for a 2MB Program is just not feasible for me.




  • Many people find sexualized depictions of minors reprehensible. Regardless of whether or not they are illustrations or photographs.

    Another argument I have heard is that people who consume loli might someday not be satisfied with drawings and escalate their consumption to photography or even try to act out their fantasies with real children.

    Also, lolicon is outlawed in many jurisdictions (or at least a grey area) since it might fall under cp laws.

    Personally I am suspicious of any “slippery slope” argument, but this topic is definitely not something I want to take a strong stance on.



  • twoshoes@lemmy.worldtoMemes@lemmy.mlExplain how!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve just looked it up and I’ve paid ~300€ last year. But only because I neglected to tell them, that I’ve started training for a new job so my dues would actually be much lower. I’ve just changed it and this year I will pay maybe 30€ or so