I thought it meant something, as they bothered to even pretend there is international law by having one in first place.
I thought it meant something, as they bothered to even pretend there is international law by having one in first place.
Its pretty fucked up how law seems to mean less and less nowdays. to think there even needs to be such vote about america sending weapons to country breaking international laws and doing terrorist shit.
Did terrorist attack on civilians break international law? I dont think we even have international law anymore.
too bad they got leaked to china where they will remain
not userfriendlyness but dumbing everything down
what started that meme in wow?
but if they run out before they have paid off the money, dont they have to give it back in some way? At least this sounds like it should have more serious consequences than that.
This is horrifying idea
what happens when they run out? do they have to start buying more yans from somewhere else?
If you take russian money and distribute the crap they tell you to, you are accomplice, not victim.
How so? Is it about birth place?
Musk becoming president is very real possibility, average person becoming president is not unless miracles happen. While yes, money alone can’t so easily get you power but it is requirement for it.
He cant choose but with money, he can influence people who can influence who is chosen.
Why is there even possibility such man can realistically be president?
and money chooses who each of these is
I said: “and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians?” and your response was: “That justifies war, yes. War sucks and people get killed. Now grow up.”
So did you mean that warcrimes are inherently part of war and something that should just be accepted or what did you mean? Or did you mean it just shouldnt be discussed or be outraged about? Without further information there is very little to go on to get any other conclusions that are not in the line of what i asked.
They have burned their good will and trust long ago. When someone untrustworthy suddenly does something nice, you look for hidden hooks and definitely dont just take them for their word. If they actually did something nice then good for them, maybe if they keep it up they could eventually clean their reputation a little.
So killing and torturing civilians is ok in your book no matter what? Because that was what i have issue with in this matter.
and that completely justifies any and all warcrimes against civilians? Even if they were doing the same to the other side it still wouldnt justify this.
do you get to spend that money and keep your house?