Imma need context someone please

Removed by mod

Oh yeah social media has ruined the ability of people to actually converse and have conversations and debate. Its sad.

I understand but I feel like most of the time when people hear the trans community is being genocided everyone thinks it’s an overreaction because they immediately think of the killing part and concentration camps that’s all I’m saying.

Ok then that makes sense I’ve only heard it in killing terms I didn’t know there was a less severe use of the word. Which is kind of odd but here we are.

It sure is. We have the xx chromosome and the xy chromosome. Trust the science.

I don’t understand how the article can claim middle of a genocide when it’s just reviewing laws and policies. A genocide is when killing happens no? Where are those statistics?

I just recognize patterns

Build a utopia

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Did I say I was an all knowing authority on the Bible? No I’m bringing up counterpoints. That’s how discussions work

Here are some real sources.

L.D. Reynolds & N.G. Wilson, Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (Oxford University Press)

Paul Maas, Textkritik — the foundational 20th-century work laying out the method (stemmatics/cladistic analysis of manuscript families) that’s

Martin West, Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique (Teubner)

These compare the methods used on classic literature that society deems as some of the most accurate books and preservation in history. Using those same standards, the Bible becomes an outlier for accuracy.

Here are some real sources.

L.D. Reynolds & N.G. Wilson, Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature (Oxford University Press)

Paul Maas, Textkritik — the foundational 20th-century work laying out the method (stemmatics/cladistic analysis of manuscript families) that’s

Martin West, Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique (Teubner)

These compare the methods used on classic literature that society deems as some of the most accurate books and preservation in history. Using those same standards, the Bible becomes an outlier for accuracy.

The amount of biblical reproductions and verifiable copies are factors higher than homers illiad. That’s a fact.

Removed by mod

Well that’s part of the problem isn’t it? If it’s just clips that cause the “hate” to be spread then the clips are the problem that’s why I am asking for the context. The full clip.

I’ll have to push back there and maybe you have an argument if this was the only time it was talked about in scripture but it is not and it matches the threads of other biblical narratives.

A common thread through the Bible is that families are God’s plan for humans on this side of death. They are good to His kingdom and to promote the values of His love. Now homosexuality would directly go against that narrative so I don’t think the “man to a woman role” is a valid argument anymore. Romans 1 goes through the “homosexuality is bad” too.

Someone else said we are to say the writers of the Bible are wrong and that is a fundamental difference in ideals that we cannot overcome. I believe the Bible is the word of God and it is complete, authoritative and not up for change based on societal influences where that may not be the case for others so we would be arguing from literal difference in fundamental values. And that’s ok to do but no resolution could possibly come out of that.