This guy Fuchs

RFK is personally invested in companies that make money suing vaccine manufacturers so he has a major financial incentive.

You got an F in grammar at school huh?

Basically they did it because they are willing participants in right wing ratfucking of progressives.

I think it’s more that the owner is an oligarch than it is the readers wanting this stuff. The Times readership likes Mamdani a lot more than the paper does.

This isn’t really a reasoning thing, you are just repeating some common lies.

Your comment above and the longer one are just complete nonsense. You’re hyper-focused on this October 8th rally that you claim was organized by DSA (it wasn’t) and which you claim endorsed and celebrated the October 7th attack (it didn’t). And then you’re taking various DSA statements about how they oppose war and violence as proof that they secretly celebrate violence from the side you oppose.

Come back to reality!

Okay I guess I will say something in addition to the downvote: none of that crazy shit you’re saying about DSA is true, they (we) are a bunch of idealistic do-gooders trying to make the world a better place.

He hasn’t literally but he’s now the heavy favorite

I actually originally heard it as something Ronan Farrow said about Frank Sinatra

Look, we all MIGHT have been accidentally conceived in an affair with Freddie Mercury

The best case scenario is that Trump really was such a moron as to believe Putin wanted peace and now feels betrayed and does a 180 on Ukraine policy. Much more likely he will stay the course on screwing Ukraine.

This is a psychotic reaction to a new social media site that is better than almost all the existing ones.

Well hopefully if he had daughters they wouldn’t be breeding with his sons…

Does having an old account really get you any respect on reddit though? I feel like at least as often there’s some disdain for your having wasted so much time there.

This is a news piece not an editorial. “Editorial line” means they have a publicly shared opinion on what’s happening, not that they’re not doing hard news.

“Low-key” as in he’s found a relatively low-key way to defy a judge’s order. Any kind of defying a judge’s order is of course a very dramatic action.

How so? They obviously have an editorial line but they never make any factual claims that aren’t true.

Haha even after that you didn’t check the article? The premise is that the claims that men don’t read fiction are greatly exaggerated!

So you stopped before it got to the premise?

I just read this semi-autobiographical Jo Walton novel called Among Others that was written as a love letter to finding books through other books - you get the title of every book the sci-fi obsessed main character reads over the course of like 1979-1980.