• we already have enough IPv4 addresses thanks to stuff such as NAT and CG-NAT, these devices also protect the end-user by not directly exposing their IP to the internet
• what’s the problem with broadcast? also afaik IPv4 also supports multicast
• what’s the problem with IPv4 subnetting?

1.19(.4) was the last good version of minecraft change my mind

whats the problem with IPv4?

thats what I call “perfectly cut”

here you go, linux 0.01

I’m the op and I didn’t even know the show existed

It’s a meme template ffs what are yall arguing about?

use xmpp

if you want to hide your IP or location then use TOR

fun fact: you could add the extra-testing to repo to get it the first day

Thank you so much for the explanation, I updated the post

whats the difference?

thats actually great thank you much!

I dont know how things work in the US but I dont understand how its possible for an ISP to control a device you own?

if you are using the ISP’s modem, yeah they probably have an interface to control the device remotely and i understand that - but if you using your own modem, with a different firmware, how are they even gonna access it?

My ISP provides fiber connection. I want a device that can provide 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz WiFi and 1Gig ethernet.

artix: adding arch repos to artix results in bunch of package issues, after using it for a while it gets to a point where you have to specify 50+ --assume-installed flags just to Syyu

i switched to arch just because of this

• ~how do i use cp~
• ~how do i kill all children of a parent~
• ~how do i remove orphans~

xorg letting a malicious program to record keys is not a security issue, its a weakness

having that malicious program on the system, thats the security issue

if you are implementing a display protocol that aims to replace the xorg, the focus should be compatibility not fixing security weaknesses especially if you dont have any better solutions, and wayland does not have a better solution for global keys, compositors are just implenting it on their own hacky way

it is but if 20 years later there are no apps that support xorg… well, you wont have the choice of running xorg

security? I don’t think systemd vulnerabilities are that critical, a vulnerability in systemd will provide a way to privesc at most, which means that the attacker must have initial access to exploit it. And considering that most linux servers are using containerized systems, a direct systemd exploit is not possible in most cases

also, more people using systemd means more devs working on systemd, so more security issues will be found and patched

“discussing privacy on discord” that should be a joke anyways i created privacy@conference.jabbers.one so join if you want