I think they mean WE struggle to understand these things have no understanding, probably because they are struggling with it also.
it guesses the next word, that is literally all it does, it’s not trying to build a model of reality to more accurately guess. It has no fidelity and anyone taking it seriously has themselves failed the turing test.
Terrorists?
to be fair Toyota has been saying solid state batteries are just around the corner for quite awhile. I’m no lawyer but it certainly feels like that bullshit could have been a deliberate attempt to stall EV sales.
healthy is sexy. There’s a not insignificant chance your ugly can also be fixed here.
I grind my own and use a manual hand pumped espresso machine. Should I be using BSD?
they can’t eat all of them before the best before date
don’t go to mini Serbia
it never went anywhere
no, this is a psy op to make people think anyone was ever on twitter
They sky has been accused of being blue
this but unironically
advertisers paid a premium
learning is the basis of all known intelligence. LLMs have learned something very specific, AGI would need to be built by generalising the core functionality of learning not as an outgrowth of fully formed LLMs.
and yes the current approach is very much using a brick to open a lock and that’s why it’s … ahem … hit a brick wall.
Turns out AI isn’t real and has no fidelity.
Machine learning could be the basis of AI but is anyone even working on that when all the money is in LLMs?
They should probably ban Kafka too, amirite?
the department of eliminating redundancy department
funny thing about people, most of us don’t want to reinstall our bootloader every time windows updates. Putting aside windows fucking up linux partitions in other totally not intentional ways.
Win and Linux on separate drives, with no boot loader, using bios boot selector is the only way. Windoze has no idea it’s not the only OS on my machine.
Wow, a video just came out that explains my position on this topic almost perfectly
https://youtu.be/AqwSZEQkknU?t=273
tl;dw: I tried to time stamp the exact point …ok, You generally can’t deduce the rules of an underlying reality from an emergent level. She calls it decoupling of scales, and it’s essentially the same problem I have with simulation theory. These programs might form a model of reality but that reality would be at best human produced descriptions of reality and most likely just a model of how best to guess the next word.
tl;dr: put glue on your pizza to stop the cheese sliding off