I think having instances or communities dedicated to that would be wonderful.
I think having separate identity providers would work well with this. Those identity providers could optionally verify age and location, and your instance can just trust them on that to make it exclusive to certain ages or locations.
You can only filter and sort what was downloaded by the client. So that runs into resource constraints.
There shouldn’t be resource constraint issues in downloading new content Metadata from all your subscriptions
tags
When I say “standardize tags on all content”, what I mean is make it a standard to have the option of having tags on every type of content, and treat tags as a first class attribute of the content. The XKCD you reference is not relevant.
That’s more the ATproto/Bluesky vision.
Sure, they use it. But it is compatible with activityPub as well.
I’m so far paging, and it’s so annoying this isn’t the default design on the fediverse.
On 4, I also agree, but what’s the best alternative?
I do like this, but it does require responsibility from the user to maintain their keys. I think having it as an option is great, alongside the identity providers I speak about.
The downside is that if you’re new to the fediverse, you have no way of knowing whose lists you should follow.
Isn’t the whole idea that you choose a trans-friendly instance and you naturally adopt the instance wide blocklist? Same thing here, except you choose the block list similar to choosing an instance in the old flow.
And if you disagree, this could still easily be mediated. For example, the instance could have a default block list. As long as one can opt out, that would respect user choice.
Or choosing the blocklists can be part of the account creation flow.
There’s others ways to go about it.
Beyond that though, on an instance like blahaj, it would be largely irrelevant, because there is no scenario where I let transphobes federate to the instance
What I suggest isn’t meant to take away the instance owner ability to defederate or moderate. But this makes it such that you don’t have to modify your moderation strategy when your users can adopt different moderation in addition to what you have. (example: maybe a large group of your users want to block US-centric content, or political content, etc.) and people not on your instance could possibly adopt your moderation as well!
An easy middle ground is the ability to sync your block list with someone else. This gives the same capability you desire, but allows users freedom to do it on their own. Everyone’s happy! What do you think?
I agree with this. I think instance owners retaining ability to block other instances is still unfortunately necessary, if at least for administrative and legal reasons. But putting the onus on granular blocking controls on the user is a big achievement, as I prefer the user to retain that control.
What exactly would be controlled differently under this direct democracy?
None of their expenses mention developer pay or salaries. Is the entire thing voluntary?
Can we please keep the respectful ones so we have a chance to dispel their beliefs? There is overwhelming propaganda against Venezuela that is easy to disprove, but most of their spaces ban us (example: reddit). I wish we have a chance to argue our perspective.
Not with gentoo!
Any recs?
I tried using bubble wrap for this purpose, but it’s too difficult and doesn’t seem to target this use case.
Is this a robot.txt alternative?
Yeah I also thought the same thing. It’s interesting that it still works, just really poorly.
This is because flatpak has a layer of isolation and installs its own copy of the drivers. If your system driver gets updated, then the flatpak one isn’t matching.
If you update your system, you should always update everything, including flatpak.
Final Fantasy: strangers of paradise
It has a co-op mode (up to 3 players), which is a huge plus for me.
Whats great:
Whats decent:
Whats meh:
Whats not good
Overall I really enjoyed it, because not many coop games I can play with loved ones.
The reason is because company decisions are largely driven by investors, and investors want their big investments in AI to return something.
Investors want constant growth, even if it must be shoehorned.
If you just make it public it wouldn’t be an announcement, and it wouldn’t have the irreplaceable first impression effect that you fear, because the only people who will see it are the very curious ones like I am.
At least explain to us what it’s all about if you won’t post it. I would love to know and see if I would be interested in contributing!
Can you give examples ? That’s partly why I ask this question.