lol3droflxp

Doesn’t really sound like it wouldn’t draw attention

Where did I ever say that a stupid AI should get any rights to its own product?

If it was a compression algorithm then it would be insanely efficient and that’d be the big thing about it. The simple fact is that they aren’t able to reproduce their exact training data so no, they aren’t storing it in a highly compressed form.

They are physically unable to just copy paste stuff. The models are tiny compared to the training data, they don’t store it.

Finally someone who gets it

The LLMs don’t deserve or have any rights. They’re a tool that people can use. Just like reference material, spellcheckers, asset libraries or whatever else creatives use. As long as they don’t actually violate copyright in the classical sense of just copy pasting stuff the product people generate using them is probably as (un)original as a lot of art out there. And collages can be transformative enough to qualify for copyright.

In reality people learn how to write lyrics because they listen to songs. Nobody writes a song without listening to thousands of them and many human written songs are really similar to each other. Otherwise the music industry wouldn’t be littered with lawsuits. I don’t really see the difference.

Of course they calculate quite well if it is worth the effort to get rid of fake reviews. I definitely think that they are something that Amazon would eradicate right now if they could do so easily. So as the quantity and quality of fake reviews is bound to rise with recent technological developments, the scales might tip into the direction of them having to do more about it. Because offering good deals as apology is not something that they’d be happy to do for more and more people.

Really? I think it’s not helping an online store if it’s review system can’t be trusted.

It’s not like there aren’t any trackers that lack any and all protection. I don’t really see the manufacturer at fault here.

Yes, but not a really big one since people should learn how to deal with information and trustworthiness of them anyway

This is what people don’t get. Information is always unreliable when not from a trusted source. Just because it’s easier to generate that kind of information now doesn’t mean it’s a new problem.

That’s true for windows as well

But how would they threaten him? What’s leverage could they have against someone on the other side of the world who has the means to protect himself by paying security etc.

Maybe read the comment I responded to again

Says the person on a website programmed by tankies

How exactly?

So the Saudi investor invests in something that he wants to go broke?

Why? Is it annoying to you that there is finally some device with out of the box usable Linux for gaming?

I think that’s less common than you assume