Well if a different judge had to fit it them in, other cases get bumped back.
Well if a different judge had to fit it them in, other cases get bumped back.
I’m glad they took action, and still found work he’s less likely to screw up. The courts are backed up everywhere, so the public gets the best possible result.
Yeah, every time I hear something like that I giggle. AI might replace us one day, but it’s no where near good enough yet.
900 pages… I mean, that’s a lot for a poorly run project…
Never did. It’s just more and more obvious with each new “feature” that it’s built for monetization, not for user functionality.
I think it’s that, and something even worse as well. There are probably many well meaning people working on these things thinking they really are creating and guiding and intelligence. It’s an opportunity to feel like a god and a tech wizard at the same time.
Similar number of neurons too.
The Chinese Room thought experiment is a good place to start the conversation. AI isn’t intelligent, and it doesn’t hallucinate. Its not sentient. It’s just a computer program.
People need to stop using personifying language for this stuff.
Yeah, that attitude is how you find yourself not voting for Hillary because “Trump can’t possibly win.”
Well now I’m not a lurker… so uh… there…lol
Having worked for a couple chip design shops, and now at ibm… ibm is the one of a few companies pushing the envelope in chip design. You just don’t need what they make, so you’ve never heard of it.
Well, it doesn’t make it easier to enlist. And it doesn’t target civilians. And it sends the message that there are folks operating in the area that have the means to do these things. No matter who it is.
YouTube playing, scrolling lemmy, and playing cities skylines fixing traffic.
I feel called out.