You might find this project interesting:
You might find this project interesting:
As already mentioned several times, selfhosting a mail server is not recommended unless you’re particularly interested in hosting a mail server, but with that said, you might find this project interesting:
I’m pretty sure that forgetting and allowing are two very different things.
That seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do, very different from allowing “notifications and messages to disrupt their sleep”.
Some even allow notifications and messages to disrupt their sleep.
WTF is wrong with people!?
The developer said he forgot that his secret keys were in the repository.
If you have your secret keys in your repository you’ve already fucked up, long before you accidentally make that repository public.
I would really want to have a really good open source SFTP (SSH File Transfer Protocol) app, with good secure key management and excellent transfer performance. So far, I haven’t found any such app.
“These features and experiences need to be trained on information that reflects the diverse cultures and languages of the European communities who will use them.”
No, they do not, these features and experiences don’t need to exist at all.
I don’t really see the big problem here?
The primary problem in this story is the lying. If there are Bluetooth earbuds in the box then it should say Bluetooth on the box.
However sometimes people don’t realize which community they are in and they just look at the title.
Guilty as charged. After reading the title it didn’t even cross my mind that it could possibly refer to anything other than mobile apps so I saw no reason whatsoever to look at what community it was posted in as the app I came to think of as a good recommendation is cross platform.
Yes, it is.
I’ve been running my own mail server for decades now (a quite odd hobby, I know) and that’s not to be recommended for anyone who doesn’t have a particular interest in e-mail. SMTP is from the early 1980s with roots in the 1970s and has had layer upon layer bolted on since then. It’s a fantastic mess.
When I finally learned about Pocket just a few years ago it surprised me greatly that I didn’t know about it before and now I use it daily:
In general, no. Most malware that runs its own process simply uses some name intended to make you not notice it. But it is possible, in Linux just as in every other operating system that ever existed, to imagine that some unusually sophisticated malware manages to exploit some unknown vulnerability to gain full control of the kernel and then all bets are off, then it would be able to do anything.
Sorry for the Danish post […]
Never apologize for your own language.
While I don’t know what exactly you mean by sysadmin, it sounds to me as if you’d be better at setting up (and maintaining) CI/CD than most normal developers and that’s something that’d be very valuable to lots of projects out there.
How could you possibly know this!?
Not having reproducible builds is definitely weird though.
https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/blob/main/reproducible-builds/README.md
Your question would be much easier to answer if you explained what it is that this ShareX thing does that you want to do.
As it apparently doesn’t exist for Linux, or else you wouldn’t have asked, it seems safe to assume that most Linux users aren’t familiar with it.
Would it be possible to work around this by using virtual desktops? 🤔