I only need ORM to have the flexibility of DSL table modeling for repeated fields. Think, createdAt, updatedAt, id (and the PK that comes with it), etc. After the migrations are written, I prefer to use a query builder

Please save yourself from lunacy by using pnpm. You can always use shamefullyHoist to get the npm compatibility

Not to the degree where bun support it. But NodeJS itself has now supported running typescript for a while

I read Fenri as Ferrari at first lol. I thought that it is quite funny to name your cat slowmo and Ferrari

No, cracking the game vs just copying the downloaded file is not equivalent. How did you not see that? With copying the file it means the original file is already DRM free and does not require steam. So steam is just a glorified downloader and launcher in that sense

Extended attributes are not KDE specific. KDE just utilize that feature while others just don’t

That’s not how story writing works. Or any long form written art works for that matter. Try to ask any writer if they ever “write in their head” and publish those as a book as-is

OH MY GOD. I THOUGHT MY CAT IS THE ONLY ONE! Glad to know that somewhere, someone else is being tortured by their cat and forced to watch them eat lest they keep meowing at you.

It means manufacturers are now eyeing linux as a viable marketable product. If they can pocket the difference between the windows license no matter how cheap, you bet they would do it

Alternatively, just do it sqlite style. Open source, closed development

If you don’t need the rich presence features, the browser should handle everything. The desktop version is just a web wrapper anyway and ships its own browser that may have bugs (to support native binding)

Yeah, they need another revenue stream first before they can retire that IP I guess which does make sense and I wish more games adapt this strategy for their EOL

From their FAQ

Q: Is the game “Open Source” now?

A: Open Source refers to the Open Source Initiative’s definition, which the current non-commercial license doesn’t meet. Ideally, once we finish another game and are hopefully able to re-acquire certain rights, we’d like to re-license the U3 SDK under the MIT License.

In sampling and statistics, I’m pretty sure there are terms for that. To account for the fact that not 100% of the population are being sampled. Hmmm, I wonder what that term is.

I ask the inverse. Why should you demand that every project that uses x.y.z versioning be a semver? A widely held standard only applies if you actually want to follow it in the first place. You know HTTP spec didn’t mention anything about the body in GET requests and so almost every web server just ignores body on GET? Yeah, some software decided to use that. And guess what? That software? It was Elasticsearch. People are free to do whatever they want with their software. If they decided to publish something non standard and you decided to use it, you can ask them nicely to follow standard, or make an adapter for it.

xz is a bit silly too. Someone maintain it alone and look what almost happened. He got peer pressured to almost hands the project to malicious actor (which probably also by social engineering)

V1.2.3 is not unique to semver tho. So it could really be anything like linux 7.1.2. To be fair, linux does predate semver by a long time. But the point is that not every software with #.#.# needs to be semver. And I think better-auth, from the issue linked, has stated that they don’t yet follow semver somewhere in their docs.

Damn, what’s the movie name again? With Tom Cruise cloned and all?

Edit: It was oblivion

Naah, I don’t really demand anything if the author breaks something on update. I just asked if the breaking changes are intentional and if there’s a workaround. Failing that, I revert and look for other libraries or roll my own. To me Open Source is always about making something you love without any obligation. Not even to follow semver.

I wonder if XSS, CSRF and other client side attacks are still common