![](https://media.kbin.social/media/f8/ed/f8ed4148b1eeb9449c665a616ef87ab911cfbad8d24c2e6b8ef79dd2cbd40a98.jpg)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/st9xYggWap.png)
0·
4 months agohe surely knows the tech. what’s concerning is how he’s blocking anyone trying to contribute to work on it if it doesn’t fit his agenda. very concerning and self centred. a total waste.
+/- | amour l’espérance (he/they)
he surely knows the tech. what’s concerning is how he’s blocking anyone trying to contribute to work on it if it doesn’t fit his agenda. very concerning and self centred. a total waste.
unfortunately he’s not one of the interesting co-author of the protocol. too self centred.
yes, on Mastodon when a user block an instance, it’s more like a mute than a block. Your posts will still be available to them, but you won’t see their content.
The only solution if you want to protect your content from being shared on an instance is to block it at the instance level AND that the instance use Authorised Fetch.
Not all instances have this feature on.
Apple Music pays two time what Spotify does. Easy pick between the two.
He is not relevant