What’s this? A charming French town woefully underpopulated by bees?

A large influx of bees ought to put a stop to that!

a policeman? racist? why, I’m shocked, I tell you, just shocked.

I’m not exactly an expert either, but as far as I know there’s nothing stopping you from modifying your own kernel on Linux if you’re a hardcore enough Linux dork who knows how to. This is part of the reason anti-cheat developers love Windows and hate Linux, the Windows kernel is practically considered a black box that no normal user is ever supposed to touch, and Microsoft tries reasonably hard to make sure it isn’t (I had to disable Secure Boot and virtualization in my bios, and add a sketchy looking second boot option to the Windows Boot Manager, back when I paid for cheats in games). This doesn’t really work (as evidenced by the existence of kernel level cheats), but that’s the philosophy.

On Linux, there are no “normal users”. Some people run Arch for fun. Some people run Gentoo for fun. It’s the Wild God Damn West. Ergo, you can say “well the kernel will have this functionality built in”, and that’s all fine well and good – but there is nothing stopping someone else from coming along, yanking it out (or better still, modifying it to always pass “yep no cheats here” to any anti-cheat, even when there are), and recompiling their own kernel; because the design philosophy in Linux (for the most part) seems to be that the meatbag sitting at the keyboard is God, not some corporation. Which, considering how Microsoft is enfuckening Windows, I consider a good thing.

Kernel anti-cheat is a bodge, a stopgap, a last-ditch effort to save money instead of hiring staff that actually give a shit about supporting a game for people who’ve already parted with their money and moderating it properly. You know the only games I was never able to cheat in/didn’t see many cheaters in/didn’t ever really want to cheat in, for that matter? The games where the developers actually gave a shit, made a good game that didn’t exploit the player, and paid moderators to do a good job keeping it free of other shitheads. Kernel anticheat wasn’t even a speedbump, not then and I doubt it would be now. It’s a shortcut taken by lazy and/or greedy companies who would rather compromise user security and eke out a few more percentage points of net profit up-front instead of investing in the long-term health of their community.

disclaimer: I am not a hardcore linux dork. I like Linux Mint nowadays and have for the past couple years because it just works and doesn’t give me shit. I could be wrong, but that’s the gist of it as it is understood by me.

keep me in the screenshot unless you want your subscriber base to know this guy from the past thinks you suck.

also, we’re so sorry. not all of us, but some of us.

but I know that there is at least one where the odds of a letter to Nature being accurate a few years later is about 50%.

…

you know, there is a difference between “getting published in Nature” and “submitting your work to Nature”. It’s subtle, perhaps: one involves being published in the journal. For the world to see and scrutinize.

I bet they get lots of letters that they do, indeed, find aren’t well substantiated enough to publish.

Also, one field. Lmao.

Also, please tell me why you made your first comment, I’m genuinely curious. Did you read about this somewhere? Where, if you recall?

it’s not about a takedown, really, I’m not trying to be mean (not especially hard, anyways), I just want to understand what Nature, or science as a whole, did to piss them off enough to make shit up about it. Or if they’re just having a bad day they oughta just say so.

that sounds like the dumbest horseshit I’ve ever heard of, both because an educational journal is built on its reputation, and because even if it were true, you’d still be wrong to imply that’s a bad thing for a different reason: proving some other guy wrong is part of the process.

let’s assume – even for a brief moment – you are, in fact, 100% correct with this claim.

You’re almost definitely not, but hey, let’s assume.

scientists are all about being right, so much so that they loathe their own frauds (watch some BobbyBroccoli documentaries if you don’t believe me), and they also take extreme pleasure in disproving each other. sometimes, good science is in trying to disprove what some other guy or some other team said because “I want to be right/I want that fucker I hate to be wrong (we’re all petty humans, even scientists)/I want us to understand the world better, and we need to know if this is in fact as they claim”. Peer review is ingrained in their doctrine, that’s what good science is. You think if someone, a person with enemies, competition, and friends alike, got their paper in one of the most prestigious educational journals in the world, someone, somewhere wouldn’t be going “nuh-uh! I bet I can prove otherwise!”? And at that point it’s two scholars betting their career dick to swing around that they’re right and the other guy’s wrong, unless of course peer review actually means that prestigious journals generally don’t publish horseshit.

in short: your claim is not only wrong, it is… a fundamental misunderstanding of how science works as a concept, I feel? Maybe not always in practice – there’s always politics sticking their dick into the mix to muddy the waters – but that’s part of what these journals pay and charge for. Prestigious peers. To review papers and generally make sure that nothing they publish is outright bullshit.

now, are they fair prices for knowledge that helps us all is another debate, but suffice to say: going “fuck you I’m gonna find out if you’re wrong” is literally part of the job.

Are you just, like… not that bright? Or is this just a transient phase, a hard night for you?

ah, so now instead of China spying on TikTok users, it will be Russia spying on TikTok users.

a paywall I am sure will be exactly as effective as google’s attempts at ad-blocking on YouTube, for exactly the same reason: a dedicated group of pissed off nerds who spend their time getting around it as a service to everyone. Bypass Paywalls Clean is already a thing.

He seems like he’s as incredulous about his position as the rest of us are. like “Really? Me? fucken really?”

you must’ve not seen Mint in a long time if you think it looks like Windows 95, I’m using it right now and it looks much nicer.

Further, that’s really not the cutting dig you think it is. Windows 95, for all its boxy, gray 90s aesthetic, was a very clean UI with minimal bullshit. If you like ricing your desktop/want it to look fancy, great, I’m happy for you. Most normal users, on the other hand, really don’t care how their OS looks as long as they can find what they need to. For normal users, the OS should be an invisible plinth that other programs you actually give a fuck about sit on top of. Mint stays the fuck out of my way to that end impeccably well.

Mint is (subjectively, for 90% of people), because something a lot of Linux nerds seem to forget is that the average computer user does not even want to think about their operating system. 90%+ of people who use a computer want it to turn on and just work for the things they want to do, and for like, 99% of the time, Mint has been just that for me for a solid year and a half. I adore it for that reason, and wish more Windows users would just try switching to it. I understand the apprehension not to, having tried other distros over the years (and having fought with Bazzite on my steam deck on multiple occasions), but it really does “just work”.

like I get it, some like to fiddle-fuck with their OS, and that’s cool, but that does not appeal to the majority of people and pretending it should is asinine. Some of us want to view and use our computer as an appliance/a means to an end, not a project in and of itself. When I used Windows and had issues, you know how much fun I had digging around in Event Viewer, or Group Policy Editor, or Regedit, or Control Panel? Zero. Zero fun was had. Same amount of fun I have dicking around with Linux. I want my computer to turn on, do what I tell it to, nothing I don’t (this is the sticking point that got me to leave Windows), and god damnit if it breaks it’d better be as easy as googling an error message (which, Mint also has enough reach/widespread use that it usually is). Anyone who disagrees, I applaud your patience, but that is simply not the way I and most other people operate.

And salty Linux ricer downvotes get me moist, so bring it on, dweebs.

the fact I made this months ago and people like you are still proving it relevant is hilarious, though I suppose the second panel should be “third party/not at all/for trump” in this context

I think for everyone who can not, for one reason or another, go out in the streets and shout “what the fuck are we doing?”, the next best, most morally correct thing to do is to piss fascists off and waste their time.

you apparently missed the word “net” in my comment. It does show downvotes on my app/instance. Ergo, his posts are still reaching people just fine, because again he has several hundred net upvotes, and many comments, meaning whoever was trying to limit his visibility has failed.

oh yeah, I’ll bet OP feels very unseen right now, with their nearly 500 net upvotes and ~70 comments on this post.

Point being, said loser has failed miserably to do anything other than make themselves look more like a loser.

lol

furthermore: lmao

It will never not be funny to me that some people are so chronically online they think everyone else gives as much of a fuck about made up internet points as they do, and more, will go to such an extraordinary effort on a site which doesn’t have cumulative karma like reddit did. which they are either too stupid to realize or too angry to care. these guys not only need to touch grass, they need to go disappear into the woods and become one with nature for a few weeks.

lastly, ow, fuck, my sides!

There’s also Ernst Rohm and (full disclosure I can’t remember names or where I read this but I’m positive I did) several other members of the Nazi party having “proclivities” that were turned a blind eye as long as they continued to be good little Nazis (and, eventually, Rohm wasn’t useful any longer – but his murder had little to do with him being gay). Indeed, much like Hitler and Rohm, I’m sure Trump himself doesnt hold much ill will towards gay people overall on account of Roy Cohn (granted he holds ill will towards everyone poor but that’s a different conversation). It’s all the other people in his orbit that scare the fuck out of me as a gay guy.