• 0 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: April 6th, 2025

help-circle


  • The real tragedy about this thing is that when the right aligns itself so heavily with the “white genocide” narrative, it delegitimizes real problems in South Africa among liberals and leads them to side with the government of SA.

    The ANC is an extremely corrupt political party which has seriously mismanaged South Africa. They do, in fact, weaponize government against white South Africans, seizing land and redistributing it to black South Africans. They scapegoat them in order to distract from their own corruption and economic mismanagement.

    This does not rise to the level of “genocide” as Elon Musk would put it, but many people in the west sort of implicitly assume that the South African government is righteous because it’s run by the party of Nelson Mandela, but even black south Africans have started to become fed up with them and gave them a large electoral blow in the 2024 elections. They are still the leading party, but at less than 50% of the vote, so they now have to cooperate with coalition partners














  • Did you read your own link? The one you yourself even quoted? It calls itself an independent socialist magazine.

    Dylan Sullivan is an Adjunct Fellow and PhD candidate in the Macquarie School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University, where he teaches politics, sociology, and anthropology.

    Which is why I don’t value his economics paper very highly

    Richard Wolff, another economist, explains socialism in a very clear and comprehensive way. If you’re not intellectually curious enough to entertain Richard Wolff, I’m done responding. On the other hand, I’m happy to engage with someone interested in learning and discussion.

    No serious economist refers to themself as a Marxian. A “marxian economist” is like saying “a psychic physicist”. Right off the bat, anyone who commits themselves to a pseudoscientific view should not have their scientific views taken very seriously at all.


  • anachrohack@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHistory Channel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    To be frank, I don’t take anything economic commentary by “An Independent Socialist Magazine” seriously lol. Socialism has been so thoroughly discredited that anybody who willingly accepts such a label is inherently not a serious person.

    “The standard of living was better before antibiotics! Nobody was poor!” lol, borderline religious nonsense




  • anachrohack@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHistory Channel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Wow, it’s horrible that so many people live in extreme poverty. It’s also fantastic that, since the 1970s, most people (92%!) on earth no longer live in extreme poverty, thanks to capitalism and free trade!

    relatively rare under normal conditions

    Capitalism is “normal conditions”, so I’m not sure what this rag of an article considers to be “normal conditions”. Is the government arresting people for running their own business or owning property “normal conditions”?