Nah, I know how to really piss 'em off. The definition of ‘white’ has always been cultural, not genetic. Look at how the Irish or Italians weren’t considered ‘white’ for many generations. So I propose we modify the definition of ‘white’ to deliberately exclude people with strong Southern heritage. Maybe we can justify it with racist psuedoscience. “No one whose ancestors who have lived in such a hot and humid area for so long can really be white.” If you have ancestors who have lived in the American South for more than three generations, you are now a person of color by default, regardless of your skin color. You no longer get to live in the ‘white’ club. If the Irish can be excluded from being white, so can the Southerners. Only people whose ancestors fought on the right side of the Civil War will get to call themselves white from here on out. We’ll even add a question to the Census that asks how long long your ancestors have lived below the Mason-Dixon line. Anyone who says three or more generations will automatically be classified as non-white, regardless of what they list their stated race as. We’ll take the thing from them that they value above everything else, their very whiteness.
Let’s look at these undecided voters:
This man has no idea what he wants in a leader and is just voting on vibes.
“>She said this of her ideal ticket: “If RFK [Jr.] was on the ticket with [former Rep.] Tulsi Gabbard [of Hawaii], it would have been a slam dunk for me.””
This woman has not been paying attention. Trump was his usual self. This is simply how he always is when the media isn’t sane-washing him.
These are not serious people. They are low-information voters who do not have any consistent policy positions and vote based entirely on vibes. They don’t take serious looks at the capabilities, policies, and worldviews of the candidates. Their political compass is a random number generator.
This election will not be decided by “undecided voters.” Anyone who is still undecided at this point is simply unreachable. You had four years to actually live in a country governed by Trump, and four where Harris was the VP. You saw what kind of policies each would enact. You don’t need to take their word for it, you can assess each candidate’s actual record.
I’m sorry, but in short, the only people undecided at this point are complete morons. You could try to convince them to vote for your candidate, but they’re just as likely to change their mind completely on the way to the voting booth because of the shape of a cloud they saw in the sky on the way there. They’re random number generators. They don’t have any capability to actually assess issues or candidate capacity. They’re the kind of people who are only allowed to vote because trying to screen out the true morons from the voter rolls would cause more problems than it’s worth.
No. This election will not be decided by the 1-2% of people who are actually undecided at this point. First, most of the 5-6% who claim to be undecided actually aren’t. They’ve already made up their minds deep down, but they just want to pretend to themselves that they’re enlightened centrists who are withholding judgment until the very last minute. Those who are truly undecided at this point are simply morons. They cannot be reached in any meaningful way, as their vote is effectively a coin flip. The real world doesn’t affect their judgment process, and they will just flip a coin on the way to the voting booth.
This election will instead be driven by turnout. Everyone except the true morons already knows how they are going to vote. The real battle for candidates isn’t to persuade people to support them. Instead, the real battle is to persuade people who support them, but maybe don’t support them enough to bother getting off their ass and going to the polls to vote. The real battle is for the lazy voter, not the stupid voter.