I’m really surprised.
There are 2 kinds of D4 dice. The result can be on the bottom or on the top of the “piramid”.
So like Word vs Notepad?
It was always burning
Check out the lemmynsfw.com instance.
“This one time at band camp…”
Good. It’s the same for me as regular businessee: if you can’t make a profit while don’t breaking the law, you shouldn’t make business.
That’s my experience too. Just absolutely to brag, but I wasn’t actively applying in the last 10 years, I was always headhunted.
I mean not personally as if everybody knows in the industry that Golem is the shit, but as in when I get bored after 2-3 years at my current job and I want a nicer salary bump, I start to answer some of the more interesting LinkedIn messages and usually in about a month I land something new.
There is no way mom would ever see my pron folder!
I’ll take it. Whatever makes them suffer at least a little bit. (Apple, that is.)
That’s what I want. Give me a Google One tier where I can pay whatever amount and don’t see ads in any Google product.
Yeah, I don’t understand why they are limiting themselves to like 5 countries in the world. They could be a huge deal, especially in Europe.
Okay, but. Are they Marxist-Leninist? Pro-China? Socialists? Anti-capitalists? Looks like: yes. Was the whole thing founded on the grounds of free, shared things and anti-corporate thinking? Also yes. Do we absolutely know for sure that the ML domain was chosen because of this? No, because the fucking register of the domain himself said it was chosen because it was free.
It was simply just free. People and their “knowledge” about topics they don’t know anything about…
https://lemmy.ml/comment/58293
Dessalines is the owner of the domain, one of the owners of the ML instance and one of the full-time devs of the Lemmy code.
I think an overwhelming number of people simply chose that instance becuase it was the instance, made by the devs themselves. At least it was the case for me.
You can easily configure those with block-chain based AI.
Can’t they just create a brand new law, specifically to cover these use-cases we have here?
Edit: And thank you for your detailed answer! It was educational.
And fortunately they made the law future proof. It doesn’t say that “hey, you should use USB-C” but it says “hey, you should use the connector mentioned in Appendix H which is defined by committee R”. That way they don’t need to start over the whole bureaucratic process the pass the law, just ask a committee to reevaluate the tech and they change the appendix. It can be USB-D from tomorrow.