Read the room bro. Not the time or place. As if OP has some control of the geopolitical instability in the entire region.
Hey @ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com why don’t you solve the entirety of the middle east conflict?
This guy is just sharing their personal experience in this shitty situation. A little empathy goes a long way.
Just a heads up as of a few hours ago the windows installer is broken.
I think the missing link is viable raw photo management and color space transforms. Photoshop is just built well for that. But in terms of drawing Krita blows Potatoshop out of the water
HERE WE AAAAAARE
BORN TO BE KINGS
I understood that refere-BAM!
I would say Lemmy is very heavy on emotions. Not a diss on Lemmy. I think it’s a great platform but my god! It’s like being stuck in an elevator with the angriest hormonal teens on the planet. Everyone, jeesus, please just chill and have a convo. My god.
It was a mumbled yes. After Mehdi asked her ten times. Only to be followed by ‘but but but’. Gotta be careful what we say about Putin, right? No problem with Biden though. Clear and emphatic out of the gate YES
Why can’t it be a yes full stop? The same way she did for two others?
It’s yes but with an excuse. It’s not a hard yes. It shouldn’t be like pulling teeth. She seems to have no difficulty saying that for Biden. What gives?
Why can’t it be yes, full stop? The same way she did for Biden and Netanyahu?
Saying yes with no many qualifiers is insane level of weaseling.
Heres a simple example:
“did you rape that woman” “yes”
vs
“yes she was asking for it”
Is not the same. That’s what she’s doing.
Saying yes then loading it with ten thousand qualifiers is not a clear yes. Nice try though.
Wrong. Her answer is ‘yes’ followed by a million qualifiers. Because for sugar daddy Putin we need to use the softest padded gloves. We’re not stupid. The ruse is up.
How come she can give a clear yes for Biden but Putis it has to be surrounded by a million qualifiers? Multiple times.
We all watched the interview. What are you trying to prove.
Give the full exchange. I watched the full interview. She said “we condemn his actions”. She never could in a full sentence condemn him. It’s gotta be loaded with qualifiers, and even THEN nothing of value comes out of her mouth. It shouldn’t be like pulling teeth. It’s a simple yes/no.
This was an interesting book (although their economic analysis is not great). I think by now all the atrocities of the CIA are pretty well documented and the world is pretty informed. This book focuses on a period that took place about 75 years ago when the US (under Nixon, JFK and Reagan) had a strong anti-communist stance and active policy.
That policy is to longer an actionable framework for the US. It wouldnt be fair to attribute the current agency the same level of culpability. I’m not saying the current CIA is beyond scrutiny but times have changed and the world has moved significantly beyond the so called dangers of the cold war.
I just imagine Pim Toole grabbing the cash with his eyes closed as Lauren slides it across the table.
You actually have to pay a hefty fee to denounce your citizenship
There’s no way they’re not anticipating this. We didn’t all wake up yesterday to Trump.
Yes. “Grigorian” was the fictitious investor they set up to act as the funding source.
However, in the communication between Chen and her husband they were able to figure out whoever that they were based out of Russia. In one of the messages between the they are found looking up Moscow time to check why Grigorian hadn’t replied to a communication.
It’s crazy.
Arroz con Pollo. I can eat that all. Day.