Just to give more unique feedback (although everything you have is good) if your willing to self host, add immich to google photo replacements since it’ll back up photos across devices (I haven’t personally looked at ente photos) and depending on how important hiding your traffic from your ISP is, consider replacing a VPN with TrackerControl which helps to stop apps from phoning home.
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
Might get some hate for this, but so long as OP vetted the text, I think this is one of the rare
goodfine uses for AI. Its not an app people are downloading and running, AI can only mess it up so much. If it helps one person break away from Google I’ll take it.
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Marcus Ranum: The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security [2005] (old, but still applies)
4·il y a 11 joursIts missing “scan QR codes as a form of captcha”
Not really, just had to install KeePass on my computer and export my bitwarden passwords BW makes that easy to do) and import them to KeePass. I haven’t set up the browser extension yet, as at a glance it says it doesn’t work with browsers installed with flatpak and that’s how I have LibreWolf installed. Setting up syncthing was also pretty straightforward.
Yeah, I switched to KeePass for the same reason. The only way I trust software is if they’ll show me the code, and the only reason to replace “transparency” with “trust” IMHO is because they want to go closed source. Innovation also tends to just mean 'we’re going to be charging you for features that used to be free ’
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Firefox for Android adding Google Integrity checks
16·il y a 15 joursThe QR code capchas are just stupid. Like the first rule of cybersecurity is to not click on random links or scan random QR codes. It would be way to easy for a malicious actor to make you scan a bad QR code.
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Firefox for Android adding Google Integrity checks
10·il y a 15 joursWhat is/was microsoft Palladium?
You’ve struck the core of why privacy oriented emails don’t do much
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
Linux@lemmy.ml•Colorado and California age verification bills exempt open source operating systems
21·il y a 29 joursWell if they don’t someone else will
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Thoughts on privacy focused smart glasses?
14·il y a 1 moisI mostly just don’t see the point in them. If the technology could run a live adblocker that would be a different story.
Yeah, as long as it’s not Google, it works. The real trick is to find a good email aliasing service (I use Addy.io) so when email are exposed in a data breach you can just turn it off and avoid spam. Also good for when your trying different emails out because you just have to update what the aliases send to.
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Suggestions for choosing email provider
5·il y a 1 moisI use Posteo, honestly I don’t think it matters much what you choose, anything will be better than Google, encryption is nice but only works if both people have it. Your emails will be as secure as the other address.
StumblingWasabi@lemmy.todayto
linuxmemes@lemmy.world•foss nerds stop being condescending to those who don't know the same things you do challenge (impossible)
4·il y a 1 moisThe real problem is when people gatekeep cool open source projects. Not a great way to grow a community.
Well dwarfs drinking age is 0, so that wouldn’t mean a lot.
Not necessarily. People could have an outlook similar to “a person is smart, people are idiots”


Same