“Temu is designed to make this expansive access undetected, even by sophisticated users,” Griffin’s complaint said. “Once installed, Temu can recompile itself and change properties, including overriding the data privacy settings users believe they have in place.”
So just like the majority USAian app out there?
Which apps do that? Because I am certain it’s NOT the majority, and very skeptical about any other apps doing that.
deleted by creator
.bik intro video file with an “empty” one to skip intros
So to me, saying “we don’t know if it was sexting,
They may have not known the source and tweet wording. I certainly didn’t.
/edit: I see it’s in the article as well.
Adding to
The value of Bitcoin has only increased over time
???
And not only a bit. A fall from 67 to 16.
Will it move the mouse for me?
Thank you
Deep Narrative: Experience a story rich with political intrigue and moral dilemmas.
we call it eine Politischintrigenhaftmoralischdilemmaischerfahrung
What are you referring to as obviously fake? The article about that bot account?
So it was falling for three years
… any text form?
The only way to meaningfully advocate for it after your company already announced their conditions and offerings is to present value gain.
What do you suggest concretely? What should be offered under what conditions? What would that mean as cost? What would the benefit be? How substantial is it?
Reaching out privately to them is certainly going beyond what you are employed for. I don’t know about ill-advised - if you never disclose it or are at least mindful of that. But it’s a personal assessment. You seem to be willing to invest a lot into a single customer, who tries to do something not offered or considered by the company. Whether it’s personal interest, or first a broader better understanding of the use case, I can see how it could be worth or worthwhile. But I wouldn’t get my hopes up about changing the opinions of your company [from their information alone].
Your company offered API access. So there is an interface available. They won’t make it free unless they see and deem it worth it to do so.
A block on Twitter doesn’t say anything unless you know why they were blocked and know the person. Blocking can be more than warranted and justified. Be it spam, toxicity, harassment, or similar things. “I saw a screenshot of someone being blocked on Twitter” is not a good foundation for an argument.
They talk about malware in npm packages. One example isn’t enough to make a general claim that all software with political opinions or voices becomes malware.
When a platform follows sanctions, and the law, I don’t think you can claim them to be political and activism decisions. If you want to make that argument and want to do so in an absolutist fashion (not assess and reduce risks but evade them entirely), then you can only self-host and I guess on your own servers? No platforms, no services?
Nowadays, there are many teams who buy popular apps and browser extensions to inject malware.
… which has nothing to do with political views and especially not political views of the original authors and sellers.
As you can see, the “opinion” or “political view” of a company is not only a way to hype on sanctions and curry favor with investors, the government, and consumers, but it is also a clear signal about potential threats. It signals that your sensitive data may be hijacked, sold, or wiped anytime if the political compass spins tomorrow and recognizes you as an enemy.
No. None of what was written before showed me any of that.
Some of the red flags I actively use to reject software:
Direct political opinions in a product’s blog, like “we support X” or “we are against X”
“We are free software and we support free software” -> REJECTED! (?)
Some people don’t like gore
What are those options?
Domain and IP block lists?
Poor people whose first Name is Al
Does it apply if you don’t say that you are posting under the license? It may be implied, the intent is reasonably clear, but an argument of ambiguity can be made. You’re merely linking to a license.
Does it apply if the link label mismatches the license? CC by-nc-sa does more than deny commercial AI training. It requires attribution, requires general non-commercial use, and requires share-alike.
Personally, I prefer when it’s at least differently formatted to indicate it as a footer and not comment content. I’ve seen them smaller and IIRC italic on other commenters, which seems more appropriate and less distracting and noisy [for human consumption]. When the comment is no longer than the license footer… well…
So what you’re saying is that we need AI do interface in-store as well? /s
Did they denounce target children before?