

Since May, archaeologists working at Magna have unearthed eight massive leather shoes that each measure more than 11.8 inches long.
So four pairs? Was there one gigantic dude there that kept losing his shoes?
Since May, archaeologists working at Magna have unearthed eight massive leather shoes that each measure more than 11.8 inches long.
So four pairs? Was there one gigantic dude there that kept losing his shoes?
It would be interesting to see something similar that required accusations to be backed up with evidence. Police reports, court proceedings and results, news articles etc.
It would also be a lot safer, legally speaking, for the service provider.
Jesus, I’d take a vow of celibacy at that point.
And probably 80% of the userbase of the platform.
Oh, it definitely is.
It’s a lot more bleak than most Onion headlines, but it fits.
I can see a use case for sending files from phone to phone, but wouldn’t you just talk to someone if you’re that close?
Also, I wonder what the theoretical range is? How many relay points will a message go through?
So, if you’re a child, watch some videos about budgeting, maybe a few cooking videos?
I dunno, what are some categories of video no youth would ever watch?
Yeah, that makes sense. If you’re already on a footpath, I don’t see how a high vis would make any difference.
Which is even worse, because unless someone tells them, they’re blissfully unaware.
With most forms of Libel, at least the victim will see it in a timely manner.
You make a valid point, this platform absolutely shits on anyone without technical knowledge, just look at the hundred or so smug replies telling you what flavor of Linux they run if you mention a problem with Windows. So, no surprise everyone is focusing on that, and not the human aspect here.
Having said that, there is a power imbalance to this that I really don’t like, the accuser gets to hide behind a veil of anonymity, and the accused has their name published, and is forced to defend themselves.
I’d love to see a source for that claim, because I do drive in rural areas with no street lighting, and high vi’s makes a person visible from multiple times the distance.
Also, people driving on the back roads tend to be paying a bit more attention.
Yeah, I’m guessing you’ve never been anywhere properly rural. The distances involved are huge, and there are almost no pedestrians, as going anywhere but the neighbour’s place would mean walking for hours.
Putting in footpaths on every road would be an absurd amount of money.
I mean, making sure drivers can see you seems like a very sensible thing to do. I’ve come across pedestrians on unlit roads, and any sort of high visibility clothing or a light makes them visible from multiple times the distance.
There’s a reason cyclists are required to have lights outside of daylight hours where I live.
Oh, that would be hilarious to watch.
This is going to make the MLs very angry.
Fair point.
There’s definitely a use case, but there’s an inherent power imbalance to these products that makes sure they will always be misused. The submitters are anonymous, and it’s up to the person being reported on to prove the accusations are false.
Or, they’re supposed to be anonymous.
It’s basically a slander app, from what I can tell.
I’ve come across similar cyclists, no lights, no reflectors, dark clothing. Just borderline suicidal.
I’d never really thought about this, but most people’s feet are significantly shorter than a foot, aren’t they?