![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
They’re not actually unconnected. The skills built on recreational software piracy simply remain useful for industrial software piracy and sanctions-avoidance.
They’re not actually unconnected. The skills built on recreational software piracy simply remain useful for industrial software piracy and sanctions-avoidance.
In this case it’s the same god so you’re covered.
Does it matter, unless there’s an agreement that says the US (or some other place where Mozilla actually operates) will enforce Russian law?
Sure, and they can regulate it by blocking access to Mozilla. That’d be within their authority.
That doesn’t mean Mozilla has to answer to them. Mozilla would be within their rights to ignore Roskomnador.
Whether they should is another matter but they don’t have to respond.
operating within that country,
That’s kind of an important detail there… as far as I know Mozilla does not operate within Russia.
I mean… yes? Generally laws only apply within the borders of their jurisdiction.
What, are the Russian police going to come to the US and arrest the CEO of Mozilla Corporation?
Mozilla, as a law-abiding organization, must at least acknowledge the requests of a regulatory agency within its own country.
TIL that Mozilla is a Russian company.
But seriously why the hell would Mozilla be obliged to acknowledge this request? Do they have offices in Russia?
I do know what you mean and I know there’s some weird British vs American English thing where sometimes parentheses are called brackets or something.
Those are square brackets not parentheses
Why is the cc-by-nc-sa license disappointing? Is your disappointment exclusive to version 4.0?
Thanks, Israel. We couldn’t have done it without you.
eXtract, Verbose, gZip, File.
Not sure why it doesn’t need the dash though.
Perhaps. They’re two sides of the same coin— awareness protects from unpredictability, and predictability protects from lack of awareness.
To an extent I agree but … there’s a difference between “braking unexpectedly” and “full-service emergency brake application”. People extremely rarely do the latter, and when they do the reason is typically obvious.
I’d say some fault lies with the motorcyclist but… the bots should not be slamming on the brakes at random.
I think the distinction is what a human sees as “something unexpected happened” vs something that the bot sees… is the bot seeing something that isn’t there, or is the human missing something that the bot noticed?
Or did they both notice something and the bot handled it in an unexpected way?
Number one rule of safe driving is to be predictable…
What a confusing headline.
Yes.
Probably one thousandth of an inch.
They’re using it as a euphemism for poop. For some reason.