Each parent has the same legal right as the other, but neither is allowed to harm their kids, or they lose those rights
Yes. At the point when they lose their rights, they no longer can stop the other parent from permanently taking children abroad so it is a non issue.
This legislation is to stop one parent taking the children away without consent of the other parent, abducting them - and I am delighted it has been introduced.
You still haven’t answered my question.
Or rather, you have. By not answering 🙄
So, do you accept that both parents have identical rights to raise and decide about their children?
Parents who do not have their parental rights taken away by the lawful judgement of the courts of course.
Do you accept that both parents have identical rights to raise and decide about their children?
This law is the cart before the horse if the goal is protecting children and maintaining their rights to physical safety
This is what abductors may claim. They may claim they are “protecting the children” when in fact they are depriving the other parent any and all contact with their children, just because they don’t like their ex. Do a quick Google search, there are plenty of stories like that.
There should be an exception for people fleeing violence
If one of the parents have a criminal conviction for domestic abuse, i. e. the abuse is a fact rather than a claim, sure.
Otherwise abduction remains abduction. Children are not a property and they do not “belong” to one of the parents. Both of the parents have equal rights to raise their children.
In cases of a child abuse, parents should have their parental rights taken away, as simple as that. This legislation is to stop one parent from taking a child for a “short trip” abroad just to text the other parent from abroad that they are not coming back. This is an abduction, pure and simple and the parliament is rightly putting a stop to that:
In their submission supporting the amendment, Both Parents Matter said: “Currently, a parent will sometimes simply remove the child under the guise of a short trip, as the risk of adverse repercussions may correctly be perceived to be low.
“Treating child abduction solely as a civil law matter is often ineffective in ensuring the return of children. Closing the loophole would create an effective deterrent that would reduce the occurrence of child abduction.”
*abduction and retaining children abroad without consent of both parents to be criminalised.
Corrected for you.
Better than being dead though.
I just need my fridge to be cold, make ice, and spit out water. That’s as smart as I want.
Yeah, the same applies to wives. She just needs to be hot, make dinners and swallow rather than spitting out. That’s as smart as I want.
I can confirm that, most are better than his wife.
deleted by creator
Have you never seen people wearing crucifix necklace?
Did he know you well?
*frogs
deleted by creator
That was two hours ago.
Use them as screw washers.