The state backed media portrayed it Biden Kamala as “status quo”. In the real world though, Trump clearly has no opposition to maintaining the status quo for billionaires no matter who he has to murder or regime change to do so.
I would argue the Biden FTC chair represented more long term threat to major US corporations than anything Trump has done.
What is the rate among the control group?
I’m sure the DOJ lawyers will get right on that after they finish burning the remaining epstein files.
This trust the process stuff is just copium. The fact george bush wasn’t prosecuted for WMDs and Reagan wasn’t prosecuted for Iran Contra are the original sins here. Unless Bush gets prosecuted we can’t even begin to fix the problems trump created because they are all downstream.
You’re trying to dam a river at the delta where it meets the sea. Threaten to prosecute bush though and you pave the path for prosecuting trump and fox news and all these billionaire media owners.
Well you need to BE SAFE and walking is SCARY.
Also in like 4 years she’ll age out of the republican dating ages which are like 11-31
It’s only january; we’re all new to 2026.
I’d call it the “Department of Defense” until congress changes the name.
I mean the “kavanaugh stop” came out of this. So yes, it was always about racism
Not much in the article. Surely there’s more going on here, possibly an unsecured firearm?
Why is the story not about an 11yo getting access to a gun?
I was like “izanami sounds like some naruto shit” imo you can simply add a second word and ruin the backwards spelling.
Is anyone running a study on whether covid19 and autism are linked? Lol
Yeah there were a lot of bot/troll accounts saying that stuff. The fact it disappeared after the election proves the point: nobody actually believes that. If somebody dresses up as a sasquatch and runs through the woods it doesn’t mean sasquatches are real even though it may be followed by credible accounts and videos of a sasquatch running through the woods.
Elections are when there’s a heavy financial incentive for some folks to make bad faith arguments to everyone they can.
I don’t think I’ve actually seen that in the wild. Usually what I see is either “voting is insufficient” as in, “historically voting has not ended a dictator’s career” or just badly disguised bad faith/bot stuff often from accounts banned before I read their comments.
I feel like “voting is wrong” is what a group of the latter (bot farmers/trolls) want folks to believe is a real opinion here but I haven’t seen anyone make that argument in good faith. I’ve only ever seen it made secondhand in a way that makes it about as credible as a sasquatch sighting (which there 100% are people dressing up as the sasquatch to fuck with people, so real sasquatch sightings =/= real sasquatches existing)
How old is the girl in the picture?
When all this is over, media lying about shit needs be made legally vulnerable to very simple defamation cases by any party they lie about. Fox news as it exists today should hemmorage money in a just society.
Starting to see the real motive behind the “AI hardware” hoarding.
The corporate mantra is “look like you’re doing work, even if that display is negatively impacting productivity” with the corrallary “Never look like you’re not doing work even when by not working you’re increasing productivity”
Dude can’t even read map.
Name one opinion I have or one person I get my opinions from