![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/9677e716-69d1-40b0-80e1-99b81d23256d.png)
The urge to both upvote and downvote this comment is overwhelming. Yes, I want guns banned.
No, it’s not mentally insane criminals. The literal children who use guns against their teachers and other students aren’t mentally insane. Ugh
The urge to both upvote and downvote this comment is overwhelming. Yes, I want guns banned.
No, it’s not mentally insane criminals. The literal children who use guns against their teachers and other students aren’t mentally insane. Ugh
Time to scrape notes data for ai
The example of the mobile phone is pretty wrong. The first mobile cost about $4000 and the cheapest today still costs around $25. The original cars cost 30k adjusted for inflation with the cheapest today costing around 15.
Once again. It’s always held true. Outside factors could make it take longer but ultimately you said never. Which basically makes your original statement near impossible.
Logically the refutation is kind of easy. Your prediction hinges on two things. A predicate that technology will never get better or cheaper.
Both of those things happen all the time as such, the refutation is simple.
Points to our entire technological history
It began with horse armour…
You’re allowed to take videos in public, yes. but someone can’t then steal that video and use it for just any purpose.
There’s a clear distinction
View is not the same as “use in a commercial enterprise to turn a profit”. Only a fool would think that’s the same thing.
The modularity is important. You might not care about cost to replace, and affordability. Plenty of people do.
What’s weirder is you compare it to a MacBook Pro with 400, when much much faster is available elsewhere. It’s not an apples to apples comparison.
It’s not a matter of subsidising. It’s a matter for of approvals processes.
That’s definitely not true in any way shape or form.
Removed by mod
I’m gonna be real, that’s cause it’s the same guys
You got downvored for truth. That’s pretty sad tbh
My vote is no. While piracy is used to store and preserve media, at least for me. This directly deprives artists, something I can’t support.
Ai in all its generative forms is bad for everyone and I do not support it or your use of it.
All the idiots claiming it’s the moon and giving more details about women’s cycles are missing the point of the quote.
Which is spelled out, but I’ll place it here.
The idea that it was a woman is just as valid as it being a man, but man is always assumed.
The accuracy of the claim is not at issue. The assumption is.
I’ll bet it’s more than 30% left but bots backfilled the space.
Even if China has access to my data, that’s way less scary than Zuck, musk, Bezos or any other tech bro.
Found one of the guys who spoke to the bot
Wait for it…
That didn’t happen.
And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
And if it is, that’s not my fault.
And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.