Even if you eat meat, a multivitamin a day is a good idea.

As for the thing that people always bring up, protein, the lazy way is to make air-fried tofu to replace chicken in various dishes. If you airfry tofu, you don’t really need to prepress/drain if before you cook it, just cut it into pieces and put it in the air frier for 8 minutes.

If you’re anti-vitamin for some reason and you don’t mind being a little trashy, B12 is what you are likely to be short on with a vegan diet. Look at the amount of B12 in an energy drink. If you drink a 1/4 of a can a day, you have your B12 covered. But seriously, just eat a multivitamin. Even if you eat meat, there’s probably something that you’re missing.

That may be true but the example in the article, Jules et Jim, is under 2 hours long.

Ah, that makes much more sense. Going back to double check things, I article I saw user the wording “he banned them at the inauguration”, which I understood as “during his inauguration, he signed a bylaw which banned raspberry pi devices”.

Thanks for the correction!

I believe he banned raspberry pi devices, which is dumb.

Edit: they were banned from an event, not banned in general.

I willingly learned excel in the past 15 years!

I have since moved on to open source replacements.

Because they see the sales numbers of FC 25 or Battlefield 6, or the revenue of Roblox.

Some of them you need to open the image in a new tab/full-screen it to see.

The ports on the laptop are different in each image.
The resolution of the ports is much, much higher than other parts of the image.

The image has a bunch of fake compression artifacts.

One character in the second panel has an eyebrow, the others don’t. The line-weight on the eyebrow doesn’t match the rest of the comic. That character has its mouth open, but the speech bubble isn’t connected.

JW are also sent out in pairs. Much like the Mormons, it’s a way to make sure that they can spy on each other because if your partner falters or strays away, it’s also your fault.

Sorry, I mean because of Luke 10:1.

Depends on the share structure.

If the shares are retractable, then the corporation can buy them back whenever they feel like it. The shareholders consented to this at the point of allotment, because they are supposed to have read the articles before purchasing.

The monostructure of shares is one of those things that movies/t.v. shows nearly always gets wrong. I was happy that Succession got it right, because they definitely needed to for that story.

If you’ve ever heard “I now own 51% of this company!!” on a show, they are hand-waiving things so hard. Some resolutions need a larger than 2/3 majority by the laws of the country/region for specific tasks, and some corporations have extremely restrictive quorum requirement.

There’s even more than one Power over Ethernet 2s, and both of them are good games, often played by similar groups of people.

(Pillar of Eternity 2 and Path of Exile 2)

The companies do this, because if there are multiple games in the same genre, being know as the one full of cheaters can make players go to your competition instead.

Some players take this seriously because they have nothing else “positive” in their life going on. If you can’t get a decent job, or a romantic partner, or save up for a house or retirement, or you have no chance on taking a vacation, at least you can win at something.

There’s nothing wrong with video games as a hobby in general, but it should not be your whole life

BBb has to do with tubas.

What do tubas have to do with little Bo peep?

Depending on the bylaws, articles, resolutions, agreements, and other organizational documents, 51% might not be enough to do anything.

That lines up mathematically.

Two coins isn’t the same thing mathematically.

If heads = 1 and tails = 2 then:
1+1=2
1+2=3
2+1=3
2+2=4
Average is 3, and the lowest is 2.

D4: 1
2
3
4
Average is 2.5, and the lowest result is 1.

d8/2 (rounded up):
1/2=1
2/2=1
3/2=2
4/2=2
5/2=3
6/2=3
7/2=4
8/2=4
Average is 2.5, and the lowest result is 1.

The show is pretty blatant in the stance that Jesus was just a normal (non-magical, not a god) human philosopher who was a little mentally unwell, and how he started to believe the tall tales that other people were telling about him.

The random person on the street that a paper interviewed said that the content warnings were nonsense, not that a warning says that the show is nonsense.

This is an article about a different newspaper’s quote from a random person who didn’t like that the musical had a warning about fake blood.

I’m not from the UK, is The Standard known for being a content mill?

The point it sounds like you are trying to make is “Email is not evidence.”

By writing “I don’t know how decisive is an email conversation printout.” after your question, it reads as if you ask the questions just so you can give your own answer.
By placing “Hah !” before the question also implies that the answer to the question is so obviously negative that it doesn’t need to be answered.

If you do both of those things, almost no one will see what you wrote as a question, at least in English. I don’t know Parisian French, so it might not read that way in other languages, and you might not have meant it that way.

I am just here to comment on your edit.

Maybe something is lost in translation, but it doesn’t read as if you are asking a question. But that you’re using the question as device to make your point.