Supposedly, I am a human, who does very human things.

  • 4 Posts
  • 168 Comments
Joined 19 days ago
cake
Cake day: October 19th, 2025

help-circle

  • Its been happening increasingly though, and I truly fear because while you might sometimes be able to tell, on average, people arent, and the owners are therefore able to control a significant proportion of the population.

    I truly believe like 30% of the population focus on making life worse for others, 20 percent want things to generally be better, and 50 percent are just blowing in the breeze with a mildly positive on average take.

    If they can get that 50% to think that the common opinion is hateful and shitty, they’ll just adopt that thinking that its the path of least resistance.

    I don’t know how we combat that without bot armies of our own, while fighting on their home turfs as they own these platforms.









  • Just 1 part of the misunderstandings. Both can go to either area even if they are typically found in their respective ones.

    Further, most who have herpes, even in the crotch region, will still show no recognizable symptoms and be difficult to test for.

    Again, especially considering that condoms are not practically effective for preventing spread, and the results are typically not the horrendous cases you’ll have remembered, the stigma still isn’t worth it.

    I mean, I suppose you could osculate and perform cunnilingus with dental damns, fellatio with condoms and no contact, and copulate and or engage in anal coitus in full body latex, but let’s be real, because you won’t be doing that, and most people who have it wont know they do, its the stigma that’s the biggest problem; the same fear that drives knee-jerk reactions.






  • To me, this seems like pretty much what they were expecting to do in the first place, and a classic case of pushing too far on purpose, just to back track to pretty much where they wanted to be; A plan that is a classic among big corporations.

    I don’t think this is good enough, because it still would make future customers wary of buying their products, just to have support for new features dropped, in some cases, just days after they buy the product.

    Some could argue that they don’t “owe” anyone that, but this is how the tech industry has worked for a while with its fast moving software pace. If NVidia, their only major rival, and even Intel, both continue to offer full fledged support for far longer than AMD, this continues to really dampen the reasons one would go for an AMD card.

    Now AMD cards will have:

    • Shorter prioritized driver support

    • Less game support from devs (due to their lack of market share)

    • Fewer games covered by their game specific features (FSR4 Suite) than their main competitor (NVidia with DLSS and FG)

    • Trailing feature development (on average) when compared to their main rival NVidia

    And users will be expected to accept this, all for a discount of typically just 50 dollars for GPUs of similar raw performance.

    That seems like a very raw deal to me, and that is very unfortunate given the already greater than 90% market share NVidia commands in gaming and even higher market share in enterprise compute (AI included).


  • It really is an absurd set of choices to me.

    If people can’t rely on your products working well for typical lengths of ownership from launch, even without the super strength, radioactive mammoth in the room of NVidia, its going to be a hard sell to sell your products.

    I just refuse to believe development costs enough for this to be a rational decision for them.

    Maybe they think people will see this, and then think nothing of it when they go to buy their next GPU? I mean to play devils advocate from their POV, many people don’t look deeply into companies and just buy based on a quick look at benchmarks.

    The thing is, many buy off of even less than that, and if their enthusiast friends are telling them that AMD is not a brand to trust with GPUs, then theres going to be a big reputation problem. A reputation problem they’re already struggling with from years of being known for bad drivers, that they only recently shook.



  • To me, this seems like pretty much what they were expecting to do in the first place, and a classic case of pushing too far on purpose, just to back track to pretty much where they wanted to be. A plan that is a classic among big corporations.

    I don’t think this is good enough, because it still would make future customers wary of buying their products, just to have support for new features dropped, in some cases, just days after they buy the product.

    Some could argue that they don’t “owe” anyone that, but this is how the tech industry has worked for a while with its fast moving software pace. If NVidia, their only major rival, and even Intel, both continue to offer full fledged support for far longer than AMD, this continues to really dampen the reasons one would go for an AMD card.

    Now AMD cards will have:

    • Shorter prioritized driver support

    • Less game support from devs (due to their lack of market share)

    • Fewer games covered by their game specific features (FSR4 Suite) than their main competitor (NVidia with DLSS and FG)

    • Trailing feature development (on average) when compared to their main rival NVidia

    And users will be expected to accept this, all for a discount of typically just 50 dollars for GPUs of similar raw performance.

    That seems like a very raw deal to me, and that is very unfortunate given the already greater than 90% market share NVidia commands in gaming and even higher market share in enterprise compute (AI included).


  • To me, this seems like pretty much what they were expecting to do in the first place, and a classic case of pushing too far on purpose, just to back track to pretty much where they wanted to be. A plan that is a classic among big corporations.

    I don’t think this is good enough, because it still would make future customers wary of buying their products, just to have support for new features dropped, in some cases, just days after they buy the product.

    Some could argue that they don’t “owe” anyone that, but this is how the tech industry has worked for a while with its fast moving software pace. If NVidia, their only major rival, and even Intel, both continue to offer full fledged support for far longer than AMD, this continues to really dampen the reasons one would go for an AMD card.

    Now AMD cards will have:

    • Shorter prioritized driver support

    • Less game support from devs (due to their lack of market share)

    • Fewer games covered by their game specific features (FSR4 Suite) than their main competitor (NVidia with DLSS and FG)

    • Trailing feature development (on average) when compared to their main rival NVidia

    And users will be expected to accept this, all for a discount of typically just 50 dollars for GPUs of similar raw performance.

    That seems like a very raw deal to me, and that is very unfortunate given the already greater than 90% market share NVidia commands in gaming and even higher market share in enterprise compute (AI included).




  • If everyone was idealistic about every aspect of life, we’d all commit suicide very rapidly.

    You might think this is super important, but to someone else, the reach of mainstream social media might be worth it for they care about an issue they feel is more important than yours that needs attention, or just straight up focus on other things.

    You a vegan? You have solar panels? You buy clothes that you are absolutely 100% sure comes from fairly paid people the whole way down the line? You buy a fairphone? You using a linux pinephone? You… Its never ending.

    Purity dramatics like that of your comment arent actually helpful and just demoralize people who are likely there with you 99% of the way generally.