No, but not every car has a breathalyzer. Only repeat offenders get one of those. So the point still stands imo. Maybe someday the saliva test can be hooked up to the ignition.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
12 to 24h seems good (maybe even too long imho) in the context of driving a car.
You can easily test if they’re in someone’s system with a saliva test, so your argument doesn’t make any sense.
That’s for known diseases. We were talking about unknown. And House is not realistic at all.
It’s obvious you’ve never had to go through this because generally no, that does not happen often.
CoolCat@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Meta's latest legal wheeze is to insist that pirating books is fair use, actually. And it might be working.English
2·2 months agoScale is not the only difference. The companies who do this end up making money with something trained on someone’s else’s work. If a regular Joe Shmoe pirates a book, they don’t earn anything with it.
CoolCat@lemmy.worldto
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•advertisers can say anything, but your content must follow the rulesEnglish
26·5 months agoI have had rapey-AI ads in youtube before. I even took a screenshot.
-::: spoiler Rapey AI ad
:::
CoolCat@lemmy.worldto
Not The Onion@lemmy.world•Hillary Clinton Says Young Americans Are Pro-Palestine Because They Watch ‘Totally Made Up’ Videos of Gaza HorrorsEnglish
1·5 months agoI was wondering the same thing. Maybe she means people of color, as “the usual suspects” is often used in this context, at least on social media. Maybe she means anyone who oposes Israël, usually more left-leaning people.
But who’s to say waht she actually meant, I find it purposefully vague. As if she wants people to think about their own “usual suspects”, whomever that might be.

I hear you. The saliva test isn’t perfect, but it’s something.
Where I live only a doctor is allowed to draw and test your blood, which is tough to do at the side of the road during a traffic stop. They need a lab for that. So a saliva test is much more viable in that context.