Listen Jack, the schools need riot police to ensure the safety of their lawns.

“newsworthy”??

Who said news? The mailing list is my k-drama

It seems like you are building on criticisms of LLMs and applying them to something that very different. What poisoned data do you imagine this model having in the future?

That is a criticism of LLMs because new generations are being trained on writing that could be the output of LLMs, which can degrade the model. What suggests to you that this fusion reactor will be using synthetic fusion reactor data to learn when to stop itself?

So how does I2P work, I vaguely remember something about it like slowly building a network as you keep your own connection on, and that the architecture makes it much better for torrenting. Is it worth looking into and learning about or is it just slow bad internet?

Interesting work, and an absolute fediverse way to look at a problem lol.

Also love the rule they pointed out that instance had of, don’t do things that would make us write new rules.

I do wonder what insights can be drawn, from a skim it seems more about understanding how rules connect to each other, rather than build a broad rule base.

Love the comment that is like second down with a link to some 5 hour live stream. I skipped to a random spot in it and the guy had the unabomber manifesto up, and said it “detailed the greatest problem in society today”. What a fucking drop for a github comment, 10/10 no notes.

deleted by creator

Rad! Yeah Arch is definitely has the mentality of, “Why would I need all that swooping pictures stuff when this HTML file works just fine?”

I currently use EndeavourOS, basically arch with an installer, and it’s been great for me because, with all it’s ‘simplicity’ and conciseness, the arch community is really great for documentation. And the Arch User Repository is an amazing tool.

Can I ask, are you in the linux community and just commenting on Arch’s choices, or was this your first look at this sort of thing and are noting your observations? No judgment either way, just curious.

To your point, the definition arch is using is computationally simple, as in fewer ‘moving parts’. In that vein, I think the aesthetic of some HTML on an information dense page makes sense. But I can see why it doesn’t fit with what most would consider simple design with their computers.

I was curious about your experience with it, because starting using linux with arch a bit on the deep end, and other distros have more inviting set ups (and web pages). In fact I would say almost every single one is more welcoming in the sense you’re describing than arch. To the counter point though, at a certain point the fluff of a lot of web pages end up as bothersome distraction, and arch caters to avoiding that sort of design.

They probably didn’t want to split the players base