Somebody skipped the checks and balances lesson in 10th grade American History, eh?
Somebody skipped the checks and balances lesson in 10th grade American History, eh?
The thing most companies are missing is to design the AI experience. What happens when it fails? Are we making options available for those who want a standard experience? Do we even have an elegant feedback loop to mark when it fails? Are we accounting for different pitches and accents? How about speech impediments?
I’m a designer focusing on AI, but a lot of companies haven’t even realized they need a designer for this. It’s like we’re the conscience of tech, and listened to about as often.
We could always go back to html chats. Hotelchat, Webmaze…
Communist West Germany? You mean East Germany?
Because I lived there when the Wall came down, and I can tell you based on the huge influx of Eastern Germans who had floorboards you could see through that quality was not a priority.
I think it’s more that they are trying to solve the problem by changing the dev team processes, when the biggest factor of success is developing the RIGHT thing. But since most tech managers have risen up from the ranks of devs, and they have a hard time understanding that other people have valuable skills they don’t, they have no idea how to hire good designers and refuse to listen to them when they happen to get one.
This is good advice. We had a Firbolg bard who loved to cook. Characters are more than combat.
I was getting harassed by my dealer to buy a new car, and I said I didn’t like the new cars and all their “features.” He said “fair enough” and left me alone after that.
Let me put it this way, with an imperfect analogy. If you poison the water supply, it doesn’t matter how many people drink from it. They all die.
In school. But I’m sure you could gather the essentials from the internet.
That’s not how any of this works. Did you never take reproductive anatomy?
Wilbur was the pig. Babe is a different movie.
Or just lean forward and ski down the dunes.
That’s not even close to true. Different breeds are meant for different purposes. Humans haven’t been selectively bred for different purposes over thousands of lifetimes.
Knowing the DNA makeup of your dog can help you head off certain diseases, and get a better understanding of their emotional needs.
Yes, I’m not responding to the post, but other comments that I thought were saying the drop-off photo is too invasive and for safety.
Now that I’m rereading it, I think I misunderstood.
I still think the deliverer photo isn’t for safety, probably more Amazon trying to humanize themselves.
I think it’s sweet that everyone here thinks it’s a safety measure and not just proof that the package was delivered so they don’t have to refund it if porch pirates steal it.
The only people I’ve seen saying “all men” are men who are butthurt that women calculate the risk of being in the woods with a bear as less risky. None of the women who are choosing the bear say that.
Yeah, that’s kind of the point. Bears tend to avoid women rather than hunt them down.
The fact that treating someone as a person hinges on what you get out of it is a huge problem.
The fact that men are debating this is disgusting, so yeah.
Being a person doesn’t give them the right to someone else’s body to survive.
Unless we’re legalizing forced blood, liver, marrow, and kidney donation?