Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because the human element is in everything they had to do to set up the photograph, from physically going to the location, to setting up the camera properly, to ensuring the right lighting, etc.

    In an AI generated image, the only human element is in putting in a prompt(s) and selecting which picture you want. The AI made the art, not you, so only the enhancements on it are copywritable because those are the human element you added.

    This scenario is closer to me asking why can’t I claim copyright over the objects in my photograph, be

    This scenario is closer to me asking why I can’t claim the copyright of the things I took a photograph of, and only the photograph itself. The answer usually being because I didn’t make those things, somebody/something else did, I only made the photo.

    Edit: Posted this without realising I hadn’t finished my last paragraph. Oops

    • NotAPenguin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s honestly pretty much the same with ai, there’s lots of settings, tweaking, prompt writing, masking and so on… that you need to set up in order to get the result you desire.

      A photographer can take shitty pictures and you can make shitty stuff with AI but you can also use both tools to make what you want and put lots of work into it.