• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    0·
    4 days ago

    Pretty much. Since electoralism is inconsequential for progressive change: vote if you want.

    Advocating voting for a lesser evil could be considered harmful, though.

        • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
          0·
          4 days ago

          I don’t think it does.

          Don’t get me wrong. I know people who want to believe voting is all that is necessary for progressive change, but they are wrong.

          Edit: How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it’s sufficient for progressive change?

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            0·
            4 days ago

            How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it’s sufficient for progressive change?

            I said *advocatingy for voting…

            • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
              0·
              4 days ago

              Ok how does advocating for voting for the lesser evil suggest that voting for the lesser evil is sufficient for progressive change? Is that better?

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                0·
                4 days ago

                It suggests that people need to vote for progressive change and that congludes their options to enact power on the system.