Grapho@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 days agoSpot the differencelemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square368fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkSpot the differencelemmy.mlGrapho@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 days agomessage-square368fedilink
minus-squarePlastic_Ramses@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoOh ok, i guess its ok for billionaires to exist as long as they simp for your dictator of choice.
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-28 days agoGetting a liberal to read is borderline impossible. They can’t even stomach short articles anymore.
minus-squareGrapho@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoMaybe we can find a way to write a really long headline and trick them into it
minus-squarePlastic_Ramses@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoMaybe .ml should learn to read past simple platitudes of “billionaires are ok because we need to do business”. Just because castro said good things about xi, doesnt mean workers havent been locked up in factories.
minus-squareCount042@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 days agoXi executed CEO’s that poisoned babies with lead. What did the US do to the CEO that poisoned American babies? Nothing.
minus-squarePlastic_Ramses@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-28 days agoI just dont like billionaires in any form wether or not they work as “adapters”. The article is just long form “the west has them, so we should have them”.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoIt isn’t, actually. It attempts to examine why the PRC has them in the first place.
minus-squareGrapho@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoThey skimmed it for talking points, ain’t no way a person with such surface level opinions can analyze that article in 5 minutes lmao
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoOf course, hence my pointing out their mistake.
Oh ok, i guess its ok for billionaires to exist as long as they simp for your dictator of choice.
Getting a liberal to read is borderline impossible. They can’t even stomach short articles anymore.
Maybe we can find a way to write a really long headline and trick them into it
Maybe .ml should learn to read past simple platitudes of “billionaires are ok because we need to do business”. Just because castro said good things about xi, doesnt mean workers havent been locked up in factories.
Xi executed CEO’s that poisoned babies with lead.
What did the US do to the CEO that poisoned American babies?
Nothing.
I just dont like billionaires in any form wether or not they work as “adapters”.
The article is just long form “the west has them, so we should have them”.
It isn’t, actually. It attempts to examine why the PRC has them in the first place.
They skimmed it for talking points, ain’t no way a person with such surface level opinions can analyze that article in 5 minutes lmao
Of course, hence my pointing out their mistake.