• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, but that’s additional design complexity, and most consumers, given the choice, would pick the cheaper option.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s more complex and expensive to have it controlled by software though.

      Hardware controlled would be the equivalence of using a splitter to add a second lamp on an outlet attached to a light switch. (would only require a change in a trace or two and a transistor/resistor or two.)

      Software controlled is the equivalence having to buy smart outlets and programming them yourself to have the two lamps turn on at the same time. (requires the same as a hardware switch, plus a more expensive or even an extra controller chip along with the need to write and program it.)

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Could be interesting to have a law that made this cheaper option illegal as it is more dangerous to society