Summary

Germany’s government approved a draft law requiring young men to indicate their willingness to serve in the military, aiming to increase military participation without reintroducing conscription.

The survey will target around 300,000 18-year-old males in 2024, with young women given the option to participate. This initiative follows years of recruitment challenges since Germany ended compulsory service in 2011.

With a growing focus on defense in response to Russian aggression, Germany seeks to increase its military personnel from 180,000 to 203,000 by 2030.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      10 days ago

      Germany also has a right-wing problem. One is the frying pan, the other the fire. Not sure which is which, but it wouldn’t be a great change.

      • elmicha@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yes, Germany has a right-wing problem, but according to this poll, 74% would have voted for Harris and 11% for Trump.

        • Eril@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          Also we don’t have a FPTP system, which might be a good thing as well (don’t @ me about Erststimme, I know, but it doesn’t change the overall point).

        • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Canada says similar but it’s looking like we’ll vote in our own (more coherant) Trump anyway

          • atlas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            this is most likely from feeling let down by the liberal party. especially since they seem to push in a direction that only profits them

            sadly, i don’t see the ndp gaining any popular votes and people will flock to conservative nutcases hoping for change

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 days ago

      I don’t think Germany is really an option, since the thing being discussed in this article (a) is just a proposal and (b) has nothing to do with foreigners anyway.

      However, if you’re serious, what is a thing is the French Foreign Legion.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    And they have yet not arrived in the 20th(!) century. They are sending this form only to young men, not women.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The draft is actually harsher for women than for men: Men can refuse service at arms, women can’t refuse medical service.

      EDIT: Don’t believe me? Article 12a GG, Paragraph 4. There are no alternate service provisions for refusing medical service.

      • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Any person who, on grounds of conscience, refuses to render military service involving the use of arms may be required to perform alternative service.

        So men can refuse service at arms, but they can’t refuse service, so how is that better ? Either way you’re still drafted into war. Possibly into medical service as well. So it’s not harsher, it’s the same or worse, because you could be drafted to maintenance near the front lines, whereas medical is usually a ways back. Or as a woman you could volunteer to maintenance, logistics or recruitment before being drafted, then you’re not forced into medical. You’re likely not even put near the front lines as a woman.

        So your statement that it is harsher on women is not correct. It’s actually quite insensitive for the men who die in the front lines for the country.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          because you could be drafted to maintenance near the front lines,

          And field hospitals can’t be near front lines? If with “near the front” you mean “you’re running around with a sidearm” then that’s a combat role, combat mechanic isn’t a non-combat role, the actual maintenance is just as far back as hospitals are.

          So your statement that it is harsher on women is not correct.

          You cannot interpret “harsher” freely, without taking account what I called harsher, after the colon: Women who don’t have the stomach to go into the medical field don’t have an out, legally speaking. While the law says “Not all men are fighters”, it is saying “all women are nurses”. You see the difference in essentialism there, don’t you?

          • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            No, i meant field medic. As in, giving first aid in helicopters or trucks as they drive away ferrying the wounded from the front lines, brought by their comrades. These are jobs that traditionally they don’t give to women. They put women in the hospitals on the back and use men in the transportation and first aid, although sometimes women do volunteer to do this job like it happened in Ukraine.

            As for a mechanic, if you’re fixing an anti air system or a tank, you’re pretty much next to the frontlines. You’re just not shooting at the enemy, but you’re still shot at by artillery or missiles. Combat engineers would be shooting at the enemy, but maintenance personnel are not. Those are specialized military personnel, not draftees. They’re not deployed to push a frontline or defend a position, so they’re not really combat roles. Although I’m not completely sure about it and if someone knows more about this than me, I’d sure like to learn about it.

            Being in medical doesn’t necessarily mean you will be taking care of shredded soldiers. There’s tons of jobs in medical, such as ressuply of medicine cabinets, transportation of medical equipment to and from medical rooms, transportation of sick people in medical beds, post operation medicine, feeding and bathing soldiers, etc. If you’ve got a weak stomach, they don’t want to put you in a position where you would pass out, then they have to take care of you too. But i can appreciate that it’s hard on women too, of course. Nobody deserves the misery that war brings.

            When you’re drafted though, you’re screwed whether you’re a man or a woman. My father volunteered when my country was at war and they started drafting people so he could avoid the frontlines and got a real nice job working in long range radar maintenance. I think I’d probably do the same if i were in that position. You get to pick where you go if you volunteer.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              You’re just not shooting at the enemy, but you’re still shot at by artillery or missiles.

              If you’re in artillery range that’s a combat role. Definitions may differ but you’re “serving at arms”.

              …and, no, when Ukraine is sending in a Leopard or such for repair they’re not doing it on the frontlines. The service centre is in Poland, the frontline is too much of a fickle place to have big cranes, stacks of turrets and chassis to mix and match, etc. That’s a different thing from a shop a bit back from the frontline that can do “extended field repairs”, say, replace a track, or switch other parts that are designed to be easily replaced. Those places are at least semi-mobile and part of the tank battalion.