• Mudface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Schools should just be one huge faraday cage. Kids have to learn to focus and pay attention.

    And they need to learn the curriculum

        • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, I’m doing quite well having gone though school without smart devices and 100% would have never gotten straight As if I had one when I was a kid. And I’m every type of ADHD you can be diagnosed as…

    • hoodatninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean I’m not that extreme lmao that’s also a safety issue. Kids will be kids, they will not sit quietly all school day and be total lesson sponges lol

      • ridethisbike@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, but the attention span kids have these days seem to be shortening. Phones and the current state of social media intake doesn’t help.

        That said, a faraday cage is absolutely too far, but they don’t need their phones when they should be focusing on the course.

        • hoodatninja@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, but the attention span kids have these days seem to be shortening.

          I hear this a lot but have yet to see evidence/sources from anyone. It’s just “look around you.” I don’t find it particularly compelling. I didn’t exactly sit quietly as a kid myself.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        How much of a safety issue would it really be? Cell phones didn’t really become a thing for my age range until high school. If there was an emergency, there was a landline in the classrooms.

        • hoodatninja@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think y’all realize that not a single staff member or administrator or any employee of the school would be able to use a phone either (other than landlines I guess?). Schools aren’t just full of students lol

          • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            other than landlines I guess?

            You mean that thing I specifically mentioned? Yes, I realize that. Would it be inconvenient? Yes, it absolutely would. Would it suck to work in that environment? Again, yes it would. If I’m just thinking about safety, I’m not sure it’s that much more unsafe.

            • hoodatninja@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s incredibly unsafe when you live in a society built around smartphones/tablets for health and safety tools to remove said smartphones.

              A faraday cage is a fun thought exercise but wholly impractical. A lot of emergency systems - such as amber alerts - rely on their connectivity. A lot of schools also give out laptops/tablets.

              • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It’s incredibly unsafe when you live in a society built around smartphones/tablets for health and safety tools to remove said smartphones.

                But is it? Landlines can make the same emergency calls. A Faraday cage also doesn’t mean you can’t have an internal wifi that reaches outside that the staff can connect to, or even the students can connect through with a proxy controlling their connection.

                I agree it’s impractical. But it doesn’t mean laptops and phones suddenly don’t work. They can still work within the cage and you can poke holes through it with a landline and a proxy to control traffic in and out.

                Ultimately, it’s definitely not worth the engineering and the effort. I just don’t think that safety is the reason it is impractical.

        • justhach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? Somehow schools survived until at least the 2010s without every kid having a cellphone in them at all times.

          • hoodatninja@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            We don’t live in that world anymore.

            Schools got by fine without the Internet until probably the mid-2000s. They got by fine without computers until probably the 90s. You can make that argument about literally anything in a school right now. We live in a society built around smart phones and tablets. We can’t just pretend we don’t.

            • someguy3@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Those were tools. Smart phones are a distraction for social media 99% of the time.

              • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry - computers and the Internet are “just tools” but smart phones are not? Do I really need to unpack that?

                • someguy3@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I already did unpack it: “Smart phones are a distraction for social media 99% of the time.”

                  Nor did I say the word “just”. You’re both ignoring what I did say and inserting your own words. They can be distractions with you know social media. But also back in my day they taught us Word, Excel, programming. You had a class with that. You didn’t need it in your pocket 24/7.

                  • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But also back in my day they taught us Word, Excel, programming

                    Well that’s an anecdote which I can easily counter with my own: We all immediately got around any firewalls the school had (which were a joke, you just browsed the right path and basically got around it) and played game and all sorts of nonsense at school.

                    Smartphones are here. Ban them all you want, kids get around it. Build a faraday cage, and your next active shooter gets extra time to do their work as teachers hunt for a landline. The list of cons vastly outweighs the pros. Hell just have a damn basket kids drop their phones in when they come into class. That’s still better than this nonsense.

                    Prohibition culture is generally a bad idea. You can’t tell kids “don’t have sex.” You do proper sex ed. You can’t block all signals out of a school, you create consequences for continued undesired usage and teach kids responsibility. As the original comment said: https://kbin.social/m/memes@lemmy.ml/t/443382/Why-must-we-be-done-this-way#entry-comment-2266000

                    Your line of thinking is what leads to rampant banning and garbage blanket solutions instead of education.

          • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ban pocket calculators because the abacus exists. Lazy kids aren’t learning how to do arithmetic because of them.

      • Mudface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course not, but I think we should at least act as if they should.

        Knowing it’s not possible, though.

        My kids are in 5th, 3rd and 1st grade. I wouldn’t want them on their phones during class as they grow up.