• Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And the sources they claim to have heavily researched often never say what they claim they say or are utterly full of shit.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      "Of course they would say that. Those Liberal, left wing universities, with their peer review, aren’t to be trusted.

      These hard-right think tanks (masquerading as anything other than a glorified PR firm they are) on the other hand are the definition of unbiased knowledge"

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    People who make memes mocking the expectation of a source are the ones responsible for the downfall of society

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Not everything needs a source. There is such thing as “common knowledge” . Things get very out of hand and very messy if you try to source EVERY claim. Obviously there are limits to this and I put common knowledge in quotes for a reason but seriously I mean it when I say not everything needs a source.

  • Mesa@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s gotten to a point where I just go ahead append a warning that I have no source and am just making casual conversation.

    Source: my previous comment on Lemmy.

  • Fleur_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The evil version of this is when people cite a click bait article, you go to the article and read the attached study and the study is not backing up their claims in any meaningful way. Like come on bro you clearly haven’t read this study don’t cite it and claim I need to educate myself.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Average YouTube influencer for me.

      It’s gotten even worse in the past year. Most of them sound like they’re parroting AI summaries of blog posts and sprinkling stupid ass cutaway gags to memes. Like rather than actually consuming the entire body of context around a subject and having an informed take, they’re just giving shadow thoughts and trying to monetize.

      Any YouTuber whose whole angle is to spicy commentary on current events in tech/programming is definitely part of the trash heap.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve heard a saying, two things you should never do on the Internet are argue or explain. It takes up a lot of mental energy and time to do it for no reward.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also trolls and propagandists employ bad faith tactics specifically to make their opposition do the bulk of the world, which they either ignore after or they just laugh at for some bullshit reason they claim is a gotcha.

      There is an Islamophobic author who has been employing shit like in his books since the 90s. It isn’t new at all.

    • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh you don’t understand how much reward i get on tiktok for proving my point so much that i get blocked.

      It brings me unfathomable joy

    • Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think in many cases the people who explain things are doing a huge service. They’re silently appreciated by many. The true GOATs of the internet.

      I’ve read so many great explanations on Reddit for things in math, science, literature, etc and I feel very grateful to the people who explained them.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes. The thing to remember is in many cases you aren’t explaining for the person you are debating with or answering a question for. You are doing it for others who may read the conversation.

        I’ve had things brought to light in online discussion change my mind or educate me many times. When I see someone claim these conversations are useless or a waste of time, I just think they are really setting weird criteria for what constitutes a waste of time.

        Sure, sometimes I ain’t got no time for that, but other times I do, and I figure the same is true for many others as well.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    F’real I think my kids have had maybe one snow day so far, and my oldest is in second grade. We live in southeast Mass.

    I thought about buying a new snowblower, but the fact is that I think we had maybe one storm in the past 5 or 6 years where I actually would’ve used my old one. The little dustings we had were easily cared for by a shovel.

    I also have a part of my driveway that has a lot of tree overhang and never really gets much snow on it. It also happens that the winter morning sun has a direct path to this patch of asphalt, so if we get only an inch or two, it’ll all melt away as soon as the sun comes up. Assuming it’s not too overcast.

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Covid killed snow days around here, they are now e-learning days. They figure if teachers could handle an entire year of e-learning one day is nothing.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Guilty. Show me the almanac. I don’t trust nobody on the internet. Everybody speaks like they’re an expert.

  • Hundun@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “My source is that I MADE IT THE FUCK UP”

    • President of the USA (probably in a videogame)
  • fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The sources are released under a source-available license, you are legally prohibited from reading them

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve definitely noticed people who challenge anything you say by asking for a source, but make tons of unsourced claims themselves.

  • root_beer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Hidden panel: guy on left saying “google it yourself, don’t expect me to have to teach you anything”

    Why should anyone ever have to substantiate their claims???

      • root_beer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, I suppose the obvious stuff, sure

        Guess I’m just rankled by seeing so many people making baseless claims and then telling everyone to figure it out themselves when they get called out on it, and it’s not the same as this.