misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoTSMC's 2nm process will reportedly get another price hike — $30,000 per wafer for latest cutting-edge techwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1191arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
arrow-up1190arrow-down1external-linkTSMC's 2nm process will reportedly get another price hike — $30,000 per wafer for latest cutting-edge techwww.tomshardware.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hardware@lemmy.world
minus-squareCrashumbc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoI mean technically moores law has been dead for 15 years. The main reason we went to multi-core was we couldn’t keep up otherwise.
minus-squarebruhduh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 month agoAnd now chiplet systems and 3dvcache
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThe reason we went multicore was because the frequencies weren’t scaling, but the number of transistors were. We’ve been around the 2-300ps clock cycle for a long time now.
I mean technically moores law has been dead for 15 years. The main reason we went to multi-core was we couldn’t keep up otherwise.
And now chiplet systems and 3dvcache
The reason we went multicore was because the frequencies weren’t scaling, but the number of transistors were. We’ve been around the 2-300ps clock cycle for a long time now.